search for: mst_primari

Does what it says on the tin. Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan at amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> ---

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:46:03PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Finally! For a very long time, our MST helpers have had one very > annoying issue: They don't know how to reprobe the topology state when > coming out of suspend. This means that if a user has a machine connected > to an MST topology and decides to suspend their machine, we lose all > topology changes that happened

Which reduces indentation and makes this function more legible. Cc: Juston Li <juston.li at intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan at amd.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> ---

Finally! For a very long time, our MST helpers have had one very annoying issue: They don't know how to reprobe the topology state when coming out of suspend. This means that if a user has a machine connected to an MST topology and decides to suspend their machine, we lose all topology changes that happened during that period. That can be a big problem if the machine was connected to a

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > seeing if things could be simplified. > > To the best of my understanding, the current scheme

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:27:58PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > > times over the

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 10:29 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really > > confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many > > times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and > > seeing if things

There's a couple of changes here, so to summarize: * Remove the big ugly mgr->up_req_recv.have_eomt conditional to save on indenting * Store &mgr->up_req_recv.initial_hdr in a variable so we don't keep going over 80 character long lines * De-duplicate code for calling drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply() and getting the MSTB via it's GUID * Remove all of the duplicate calls to

This is the large series for adding MST suspend/resume reprobing that I've been working on for quite a while now. In addition, I: - Refactored and cleaned up any code I ended up digging through in the process of understanding how some parts of these helpers worked. - Added some debugging tools along the way that I ended up needing to figure out some issues in my own code Note that

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

While this isn't a complete fix, this will improve the reliability of drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() pretty significantly during hotplug events, since there's a chance that the in-memory topology tree may not be fully updated when drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() is called and thus might end up causing our search to fail on an mstb whose topology refcount has reached 0,

While this isn't a complete fix, this will improve the reliability of drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() pretty significantly during hotplug events, since there's a chance that the in-memory topology tree may not be fully updated when drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_and_mstb() is called and thus might end up causing our search to fail on an mstb whose topology refcount has reached 0,

s/drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref/drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated/ s/drm_dp_put_port/drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port/ s/drm_dp_get_validated_mstb_ref/drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated/ s/drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device/drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb/ This is a much more consistent naming scheme, and will make even more sense once we redesign how the current refcounting scheme here works.

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a