Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "msi_driv".
Did you mean:
msi_dev
2014 Aug 20
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...ned before, in device-driver model.
>
> I abstracted a new virtual device (called struct msi_dev), this msi_dev will
> manage all MSI info,
Will this "struct msi_dev" will be part of "struct device"?
> and a new bus named msi_bus, also introduced a new driver
> msi_driver, msi_bus is responsible for binding msi_dev and msi_driver.
> All MSI devices will be classified into different MSI device types, like
> MSI_TYPE_PCI, MSI_TYPE_HPET, MSI_TYPE_DMAR, etc..
>
> Each MSI type device should provide a private struct msi_driver. msi_driver
> should conta...
2014 Aug 20
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...ned before, in device-driver model.
>
> I abstracted a new virtual device (called struct msi_dev), this msi_dev will
> manage all MSI info,
Will this "struct msi_dev" will be part of "struct device"?
> and a new bus named msi_bus, also introduced a new driver
> msi_driver, msi_bus is responsible for binding msi_dev and msi_driver.
> All MSI devices will be classified into different MSI device types, like
> MSI_TYPE_PCI, MSI_TYPE_HPET, MSI_TYPE_DMAR, etc..
>
> Each MSI type device should provide a private struct msi_driver. msi_driver
> should conta...
2014 Aug 20
0
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
...isting HPET, DMAR device both
have no bus bind. I'm working on a new MSI setup framework, as you mentioned before, in device-driver model.
I abstracted a new virtual device (called struct msi_dev), this msi_dev will manage all MSI info, and a new bus
named msi_bus, also introduced a new driver msi_driver, msi_bus is responsible for binding msi_dev and msi_driver.
All MSI devices will be classified into different MSI device types, like MSI_TYPE_PCI, MSI_TYPE_HPET, MSI_TYPE_DMAR, etc..
Each MSI type device should provide a private struct msi_driver. msi_driver should contain the type specific
MSI...
2014 Aug 20
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
Hi Yijing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Yijing Wang
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:34 AM
> To: Basu Arnab-B45036
> Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm-
> kernel at
2014 Aug 20
2
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
Hi Yijing
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Yijing Wang
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 8:34 AM
> To: Basu Arnab-B45036
> Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm-
> kernel at
2014 Aug 20
1
[RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Yijing Wang
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM
> To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm-
> kernel at
2014 Aug 20
1
[RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-owner at vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Yijing Wang
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:39 AM
> To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Xinwei Hu; Wuyun; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> Paul.Mundt at huawei.com; James E.J. Bottomley; Marc Zyngier; linux-arm-
> kernel at