Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "msg83177".
Did you mean:
msg00177
2020 Mar 11
6
[PATCH RFC v2 02/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved commands
...of the sdev queue and the per-host
> reserved_cmd_q. Back then you questioned using the sdev queue for virtio
> scsi, and the unconfirmed conclusion was to use a common per-host q. This is
> the best link I can find now:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org/msg83177.html
That was just a question on why virtio uses the per-device tags, which
didn't look like it made any sense. What I'm worried about here is
mixing up the concept of reserved tags in the tagset, and queues to use
them. Note that we already have the scsi_get_host_dev to allocate
a scsi_...
2020 Mar 11
6
[PATCH RFC v2 02/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved commands
...of the sdev queue and the per-host
> reserved_cmd_q. Back then you questioned using the sdev queue for virtio
> scsi, and the unconfirmed conclusion was to use a common per-host q. This is
> the best link I can find now:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org/msg83177.html
That was just a question on why virtio uses the per-device tags, which
didn't look like it made any sense. What I'm worried about here is
mixing up the concept of reserved tags in the tagset, and queues to use
them. Note that we already have the scsi_get_host_dev to allocate
a scsi_...
2020 Apr 07
0
[PATCH RFC v2 02/24] scsi: allocate separate queue for reserved commands
...ing the sdev queue for
>>>> virtio
>>>> scsi, and the unconfirmed conclusion was to use a common per-host q.
>>>> This is
>>>> the best link I can find now:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org/msg83177.html
>>>
>>> That was just a question on why virtio uses the per-device tags, which
>>> didn't look like it made any sense.? What I'm worried about here is
>>> mixing up the concept of reserved tags in the tagset, and queues to use
>>> them.? Not...