search for: msg44195

...favour of converting vhost to a virtual device infrastructure. Thanks for pointing me out at [3], I should have a better look at it. Thanks Guennadi > [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338335 > [2]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > > Thanks, > Arnaud > > > > > Thanks > > Guennadi > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (4): > > vhost: convert VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING to a generic ioctl > > rpmsg:...

...favour of converting vhost to a virtual device infrastructure. Thanks for pointing me out at [3], I should have a better look at it. Thanks Guennadi > [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338335 > [2]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > > Thanks, > Arnaud > > > > > Thanks > > Guennadi > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (4): > > vhost: convert VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING to a generic ioctl > > rpmsg:...

...sed for both sides of the link, instead of introducing a new API just for the server side. That can be done without rewriting drivers/vhost/. > > [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338335 > > [2]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html

...This is also proposed in the "Enhance VHOST to enable SoC-to-SoC communication" RFC[3]. Do you think that this alternative could match with your need? [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338335 [2]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html Thanks, Arnaud > > Thanks > Guennadi > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (4): > vhost: convert VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING to a generic ioctl > rpmsg: move common structures and defines to headers > rpmsg:...

...ut at [3], I should have a better look at it. > > > > Thanks > > Guennadi > > > > > [1]. > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 > > > 335 [2]. > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > > > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Guennadi > > > > > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski...

...ut at [3], I should have a better look at it. > > > > Thanks > > Guennadi > > > > > [1]. > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 > > > 335 [2]. > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > > > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Guennadi > > > > > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski...

...ure. > > Thanks for pointing me out at [3], I should have a better look at it. > > Thanks > Guennadi > > > [1]. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 > > 335 [2]. > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > > [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > > > > Thanks, > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Guennadi > > > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (4): > > > vhost: convert VHOST_VSOCK_S...

...d have a better look at it. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Guennadi >>> >>>> [1]. >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 >>>> 335 [2]. >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html >>>> [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Arnaud >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Guennadi >>>>> >>>>> Guennad...

...;> > >>> Thanks > >>> Guennadi > >>> > >>>> [1]. > >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 > >>>> 335 [2]. > >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > >>>> [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Arnaud > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> Guennadi > >...

...;> > >>> Thanks > >>> Guennadi > >>> > >>>> [1]. > >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=338 > >>>> 335 [2]. > >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-virtualization/msg44195.html > >>>> [3]. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-remoteproc/msg06634.html > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Arnaud > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> Guennadi > >...

Hi, Next update: v6: - rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h v5: - don't hard-code message layout v4: - add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different

Hi, Next update: v6: - rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h v5: - don't hard-code message layout v4: - add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different