Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "msg43592".
2017 Feb 05
2
clang/llvm support for %= in inline assembly
from https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
Under certain circumstances, GCC may duplicate (or remove duplicates of)
> your assembly code when optimizing. This can lead to unexpected duplicate
> symbol errors during compilation if your asm code defines symbols or
> labels. Using ‘%=’ (see AssemblerTemplate) may help resolve this problem.
‘%=’
> Outputs a number that is
2017 Feb 05
2
clang/llvm support for %= in inline assembly
...b 2017, at 10:50, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I think we may already support it. At least that's the implication from the post-commit thread of r288093, in particular this reply from Reid https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org/msg43592.html
>
> Do you have a test case?
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> from https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html
>
> Under certain circumstances, GCC may duplicate...