Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "msg33123".
Did you mean:
msg03120
2003 Oct 07
1
Still having touble with Redhat 7.1 and windows 2003 DC authentication.
...articles/view.aspx?class=2&articleid=2
There's something wrong with the SMB Packet signing on this machine.
In parallel, I succcessfully built and have got working samba-devel on
FreeBSD 5.1 against the same ADS.
I used these hints:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg33123.html
and it works (using a pretty much identical smb.conf)
Key additions are:
client signing = Yes
server signing = Yes
client use spnego = Yes
The box I'm having trouble with is a redhat 7.1 box. I've upgraded the
standard 7.1 RPMs re. krb & pam from:
[root@pot...
2005 Jan 28
0
question about libsmbclient
...ks well for the most part of network. However, there are some old
machines running Win98 and this method doesn't work for them.
After googling I found that Win98 requires NetBIOS name to be specified:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-April/085175.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg33123.html
So, if I use only name I can't properly scan machines with the same
names. If I use only IP - I can't scan machines with Win98. The solution
is to use both! smbclient already allows to specify both name and IP
(via -I cmdline option). But the libsmbclient doesn't have such ability...