search for: msg212685

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "msg212685".

2020 Apr 17
2
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...ly but I don't see how that changes logic at all. >> >> Sorry for being unclear. >> >> I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left >> in the defconfigs. > But who cares? FYI, please see https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > That does not add any code, does it? It doesn't. Thanks > >> This requires the arch maintainers to add >> "CONFIG_VHOST_VDPN is not set". (Geert complains about this) >> >> Thanks >> >>
2020 Apr 17
2
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...ly but I don't see how that changes logic at all. >> >> Sorry for being unclear. >> >> I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left >> in the defconfigs. > But who cares? FYI, please see https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > That does not add any code, does it? It doesn't. Thanks > >> This requires the arch maintainers to add >> "CONFIG_VHOST_VDPN is not set". (Geert complains about this) >> >> Thanks >> >>
2020 Apr 17
4
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...es logic at all. >>>> Sorry for being unclear. >>>> >>>> I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left >>>> in the defconfigs. >>> But who cares? >> FYI, please seehttps://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused > everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. There could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defconfigs even if CONFIG_VHOST i...
2020 Apr 17
4
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...es logic at all. >>>> Sorry for being unclear. >>>> >>>> I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left >>>> in the defconfigs. >>> But who cares? >> FYI, please seehttps://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused > everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. There could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defconfigs even if CONFIG_VHOST i...
2020 Apr 17
1
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...; > > > > > > > > > > > I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left > > > > > > in the defconfigs. > > > > > But who cares? > > > > FYI, please seehttps://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > > > The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused > > > everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. > > > > There could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a > > CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be...
2020 Apr 17
0
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
.... > > > > > > Sorry for being unclear. > > > > > > I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left > > > in the defconfigs. > > But who cares? > > > FYI, please see https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. > > > That does not add any code, does it? > > > It doesn't. > > Thanks > > > > > > > This requires the arch m...
2020 Apr 17
0
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...y for being unclear. > > > > > > > > > > I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left > > > > > in the defconfigs. > > > > But who cares? > > > FYI, please seehttps://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > > The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused > > everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. > > > There could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a > CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defco...
2020 Apr 17
0
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
...y for being unclear. > > > > > > > > > > I meant since it was enabled by default, "CONFIG_VHOST_DPN=y" will be left > > > > > in the defconfigs. > > > > But who cares? > > > FYI, please seehttps://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg212685.html > > The complaint was not about the symbol IIUC. It was that we caused > > everyone to build vhost unless they manually disabled it. > > > There could be some misunderstanding here. I thought it's somehow similar: a > CONFIG_VHOST_MENU=y will be left in the defco...
2020 Apr 17
2
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
On 2020/4/17 ??2:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:12:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/4/17 ??6:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:43:56AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> We try to keep the defconfig untouched after decoupling CONFIG_VHOST >>>> out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION in commit 20c384f1ea1a
2020 Apr 17
2
[PATCH V2] vhost: do not enable VHOST_MENU by default
On 2020/4/17 ??2:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:12:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/4/17 ??6:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:43:56AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> We try to keep the defconfig untouched after decoupling CONFIG_VHOST >>>> out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION in commit 20c384f1ea1a