search for: msg20189

...ion the BIND >>> ioctl is different from the one used by VT-d, so this solution didn't get >>> much appreciation. >> >> Could you please share the links on this ? Please find the latest discussion at https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg20189.html >>> The alternative is to bind PASID tables. >> >> Sorry, i didnt get the difference here. PASID table is what we call Context Table in SMMU, it's the array associating a PASID (SSID) to a context descriptor. In the SMMUv3 the stream table entry (device descriptor)...

Hi Jean, On Tue Oct 24, 2017 at 10:28:59PM +0530, Linu Cherian wrote: > Hi Jean, > Thanks for your reply. > > On Tue Oct 24, 2017 at 09:37:12AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Hi Linu, > > > > On 24/10/17 07:27, Linu Cherian wrote: > > > Hi Jean, > > > > > > On Mon Oct 23, 2017 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:

...l is different from the one used by VT-d, so this solution didn't get > >>> much appreciation. > >> > >> Could you please share the links on this ? > > Please find the latest discussion at > https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg20189.html > > >>> The alternative is to bind PASID tables. > >> > >> Sorry, i didnt get the difference here. > > PASID table is what we call Context Table in SMMU, it's the array > associating a PASID (SSID) to a context descriptor. In the SMMUv3 the >...

...l is different from the one used by VT-d, so this solution didn't get > >>> much appreciation. > >> > >> Could you please share the links on this ? > > Please find the latest discussion at > https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org/msg20189.html > > >>> The alternative is to bind PASID tables. > >> > >> Sorry, i didnt get the difference here. > > PASID table is what we call Context Table in SMMU, it's the array > associating a PASID (SSID) to a context descriptor. In the SMMUv3 the >...

Hi Jean, Thanks for your reply. On Tue Oct 24, 2017 at 09:37:12AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Linu, > > On 24/10/17 07:27, Linu Cherian wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > On Mon Oct 23, 2017 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > >> This is version 0.5 of the virtio-iommu specification, the paravirtualized > >> IOMMU. This version

Hi Jean, Thanks for your reply. On Tue Oct 24, 2017 at 09:37:12AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Linu, > > On 24/10/17 07:27, Linu Cherian wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > On Mon Oct 23, 2017 at 10:32:41AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > >> This is version 0.5 of the virtio-iommu specification, the paravirtualized > >> IOMMU. This version