Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "msg134710".
2016 Jun 17
2
problem with domain and samba3x
Hi all
About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server
with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site.
Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would
normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including
samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc,
samba3x-domainjoin-gui,
2016 Jun 20
3
problem with domain and samba3x
...ins. Many have posted asking for help, but I have seen no
> solution presented on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It may
> be that NT4 classic domains will not work going forward.
>
> For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html
>
> In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic
> ldap domains.
I did some testing before the badlock patches and did manage to get an
ldap based NT4 PDC running and connected a Unix client to it, but this
was a test domain and it didn't use smbldap-to...
2016 Jun 20
0
problem with domain and samba3x
...for Samba classic domains.
Many have posted asking for help, but I have seen no solution presented
on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It may be that NT4 classic
domains will not work going forward.
For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html
In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic
ldap domains.
So, if anyone has a working Samba/openldap NT4 classic domain
post-badlock patches, would you please share your config to help these
people?
And, if you have a working 4.3 or 4.4 classic domain config, ple...
2016 Jun 20
0
problem with domain and samba3x
...ed asking for help, but I have seen no
>> solution presented on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It
>> may be that NT4 classic domains will not work going forward.
>>
>> For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html
>>
>> In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic
>> ldap domains.
>
> I did some testing before the badlock patches and did manage to get an
> ldap based NT4 PDC running and connected a Unix client to it, but this
> was a test domain a...