search for: msg134710

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "msg134710".

2016 Jun 17
2
problem with domain and samba3x
Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,
2016 Jun 20
3
problem with domain and samba3x
...ins. Many have posted asking for help, but I have seen no > solution presented on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It may > be that NT4 classic domains will not work going forward. > > For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html > > In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic > ldap domains. I did some testing before the badlock patches and did manage to get an ldap based NT4 PDC running and connected a Unix client to it, but this was a test domain and it didn't use smbldap-to...
2016 Jun 20
0
problem with domain and samba3x
...for Samba classic domains. Many have posted asking for help, but I have seen no solution presented on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It may be that NT4 classic domains will not work going forward. For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky: http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic ldap domains. So, if anyone has a working Samba/openldap NT4 classic domain post-badlock patches, would you please share your config to help these people? And, if you have a working 4.3 or 4.4 classic domain config, ple...
2016 Jun 20
0
problem with domain and samba3x
...ed asking for help, but I have seen no >> solution presented on this list; i.e. the silence is deafening. It >> may be that NT4 classic domains will not work going forward. >> >> For example, refer to the post by Peter Tuharsky: >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg134710.html >> >> In all actuality, Samba 4.3.x pre-badlock had already broken classic >> ldap domains. > > I did some testing before the badlock patches and did manage to get an > ldap based NT4 PDC running and connected a Unix client to it, but this > was a test domain a...