Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "msg01685".
Did you mean:
msg01645
2010 Sep 27
2
BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity
...ly the culprit.
>
> I see. Most likely guest bug - won't be the first bug around UFO.
> If so pls copy netdev linux-nfs and virtualization.
> Do you see anything in dmesg? Can try 2.6.36-rc5?
(for reference: first post is at:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-09/msg01685.html )
I can't reproduce it on 2.6.36-rc5. Do you have an idea which patch may have
fixed it, or should I dissect?
2.6.32.x - there's nothing interesting in dmesg, apart from traces related
to tasks in D state waiting on the NFS mounts:
[ 84.396127] nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding,...
2010 Sep 27
2
BUG - qdev - partial loss of network connectivity
...ly the culprit.
>
> I see. Most likely guest bug - won't be the first bug around UFO.
> If so pls copy netdev linux-nfs and virtualization.
> Do you see anything in dmesg? Can try 2.6.36-rc5?
(for reference: first post is at:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-09/msg01685.html )
I can't reproduce it on 2.6.36-rc5. Do you have an idea which patch may have
fixed it, or should I dissect?
2.6.32.x - there's nothing interesting in dmesg, apart from traces related
to tasks in D state waiting on the NFS mounts:
[ 84.396127] nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding,...