search for: msg00931

Hi Everyone, I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html This email includes status and instructions for use. Compared to the old llvm-gcc, this front-end has many advantages: it is far faster, is based on GCC 4.0.1 instead of a GCC 3.4 prerelease snapshot, and it fixes several dozen of the "impossible to fix in the old front-end" bugs...

Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html > This email includes status and instructions for use. The instructions seem to have one path wrong. It says to get: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/apple/trunk/gcc, revision 108127. but the patch won't apply to that directory, because it tries to change things under libstdc++...

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html >> This email includes status and instructions for use. > > The instructions seem to have one path wrong. It says to get: I'll put together a tarball today. That will be easier than dealing with a patch, and it will include a bunch of bugfixes since the previous email. -Chr...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >>> I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html >>> This email includes status and instructions for use. >> >> The instructions seem to have one path wrong. It says to get: > > I'll put together a tarball today. That will be easier than dealing with > a patch, and it will include a bunch of bugfixes since...

Hello folks, I'm having trouble configuring Asterisk to play an "invalid extension" message to anyone dialing an undefined extension. First I tried using the 'i' pseudo-extension, but it didn't work at all; searching the wiki I found that page: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20i%20extension where it basically says that the 'i'