Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "msg00763".
Did you mean:
msg00063
2006 Jan 08
3
VT-x and frontend/backend drivers
Hello,
As I saw in this mailing list, there should be some
emulation solution for drivers when using VT-x processors.
See for example :
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-12/msg00763.html
My question is this;
As I understand, the VMX support in the new VT-x processors
enables us to prevent Guest OSs from performing
unwanted instructions (HLT , for example). This is
done by using the root and non-root VMX operation.
Thus , we don''t use paravirtualization and we...
2006 Mar 13
1
[BUG 143] [RFC] Patch submitted, not in tree yet.
...zed that the fix
for bug 143 was not in the tree yet.
Jon Mason posted a patch, with no negative feedback:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-02/msg00162.html
The bug originator tested the patch successfully on -rc4:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-02/msg00763.html
I''ve retested on -rc5: (changeset 9197). Aside from the file name changes
from -rc2 to -rc5,
it still applies/builds cleanly and still fixes the bug.
Does the patch need changes, or has it managed to slip through the cracks
twice now?
Jim
______________________________________...
2001 Nov 13
4
EXT3 with 2.2.20 - Is it stable enough for a production server th at is used 24X7?
Hello All,
I have a production server that is running 2.2.20. This server *has* to be
up 24X7 - what I'm wondering is:
1) Is ext3 on 2.2.20 rock stable? Or, would you recommend that I just stay
with ext2?
2) I have looked far and wide for a the ext3 patch for 2.2.20 - where can I
find it?
3) Were are the e2fsprogs that are appropriate to run with the 2.2.X kernel
series?
Thanks,