Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "msg00644".
2008 Jul 02
0
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...e unsafe language with
another, presumably with enormous effort.
The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
no progress.
-- hendrik
2008 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
Hi,
Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html
There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++.
Best regards,
--Edwin
2008 Jul 03
1
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...other, presumably with enormous effort.
>
> The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
> instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
>
> But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
As it should be.
>
> If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
> no progress.
Who is we? I haven't seen any patches from you to GCC. I grepped all
the Changelogs.
In any case, you will only make no progress by your definition of progress.
It would c...
2008 Jul 02
2
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...other, presumably with enormous effort.
>
> The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
> instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
>
> But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
>
> If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
> no progress.
Another perspective on this sort of issue, if you haven't seen it:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2007/10/tablua_fracta.html.
Part of what makes LLVM interesting is that there...