Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "msg00502".
Did you mean:
msg0002
2008 Jul 02
0
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...g gcc to C++.
>
> Best regards,
> --Edwin
The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with
another, presumably with enormous effort.
The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
no progress.
-- hendrik
2008 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
Hi,
Have you seen this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00385.html
There is a new branch for converting gcc to C++.
Best regards,
--Edwin
2008 Jul 03
1
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...regards,
>> --Edwin
>
> The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with
> another, presumably with enormous effort.
>
> The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
> instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
>
> But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
As it should be.
>
> If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
> no progress.
Who is we? I haven't seen any patches from you to GCC. I...
2008 Jul 02
2
[LLVMdev] gcc in c++
...ik at topoi.pooq.com> wrote:
> The sad thing is that they seem to be replacing one unsafe language with
> another, presumably with enormous effort.
>
> The only hopeful sign in that thread is the proposal for using Cyclone
> instead, starting here:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00502.html
>
> But it is summarily tossed out, without examination:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00644.html
>
> If all we can ever use are languages that everyone knows, there will be
> no progress.
Another perspective on this sort of issue, if you haven't seen it:
http:...
2006 Mar 01
0
Changing Xen hard memory limit in running domain
...ed on. Was it ever fixed?
"out-of-memory problem when restoring ballooned domains"
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-03/msg00480.html
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-03/msg00498.html
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-03/msg00502.html
Kindly
Lars Rasmusson
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users