search for: msg00468

...tBSD and FreeBSD seems to use older ATPCS ABI standard. > As I can see it is not supported in LLVM. > > Seems that ATPCS is predecessor of AAPCS so I wonder how easy is > to implement it in LLVM/Clang... > > Is it worth efforts? Any thoughts? See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-05/msg00468.html : "Do they still want their OS to work on modern CPUs with any degree of efficiency? The current ABI diverged from the old for good technical reasons, not just for the sake of being different." If you want it to run efficiently on modern multicore systems you really need 6...

Hi, Both NetBSD and FreeBSD seems to use older ATPCS ABI standard. As I can see it is not supported in LLVM. Seems that ATPCS is predecessor of AAPCS so I wonder how easy is to implement it in LLVM/Clang... Is it worth efforts? Any thoughts? Thanks, Damjan

...ATPCS ABI standard. >> As I can see it is not supported in LLVM. >> >> Seems that ATPCS is predecessor of AAPCS so I wonder how easy is >> to implement it in LLVM/Clang... >> >> Is it worth efforts? Any thoughts? > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-05/msg00468.html : > > "Do they still want their OS to work on modern CPUs with any > degree of efficiency? The current ABI diverged from the old for > good technical reasons, not just for the sake of being different." > > If you want it to run efficiently on modern multicor...

I've been monitoring CPU temperature on a few Dell SC1435s running CentOS4 via OpenIPMI and 'ipmitool sdr'. It's been working very nicely, but the upgrade to 4.5 not so long ago seems to have broken something: # ipmitool sdr type Temperature Temp | 01h | ns | 3.1 | Disabled Planar Temp | 04h | ok | 7.1 | 30 degrees C Temp Interface | 53h | ns | 7.1