Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "msg00305".
Did you mean:
msg00005
2005 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
...> ValueTypeEPKNS_4TypeE' of
>> /home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/Debug/lib/LLVMSelectionDA
>> G.o
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> I believe this is a binutils issue (ld belongs to binutils).
> See for example:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/10/msg00305.html
Thanks! Downgraded the binutils package from 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 (Debian
unstable) to 2.16.1-2 (testing). The message still appears, but no error
is reported and the build completes. Found similar messages in what
appears to be an automated daily build for ia64 ... assuming those
messages...
2005 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
...._ZNK4llvm14TargetLowering12get
> ValueTypeEPKNS_4TypeE' of
> /home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/Debug/lib/LLVMSelectionDA
> G.o
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I believe this is a binutils issue (ld belongs to binutils).
See for example:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/10/msg00305.html
Marco
2005 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
Hi,
Tried to build the 1.6 release on Debian unstable, but ran into link
problems for some utils ...
Copying the messages when building llc, the same error occurs for lli,
llvm-db and some of the examples. Is this a problem with the compiler
version? LLVMSelectionDAG.o itself builds correctly.
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/tools/llc'
llvm[2]: Linking Debug
2008 Jul 29
1
Dom0 on Debian Lenny on amd64?
Are there instructions anywhere for setting up dom0 under Debian Lenny
on amd64? Are there suitable Debian packages?
James.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2005 Oct 28
0
Reverting bridge/antispoofing param removal
...specifying br0
as the bridge name in xend-config.spx and it was still using
the original default xenbr0. When the bridge name is
specified in the network-bridge script, it is created
correctly (ditto anti-spoofing).
A recent patchset:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2005-10/msg00305.html
removed the parameters vif-bridge and anti-spoofing from
the xend/vifctl.py as the script was allowing them
to be configured.
The config file still has the examples, however, which
results in the user setting those parameters in
xend-config.spx futilely. The actual parameter that is
used is...