Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "msg00285".
Did you mean:
msg00255
2018 Mar 20
3
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
...e compatible
with SHSTK (see Section 13.1.2) where return address popped from shadow stack always matches
return address popped from normal stack.
It is not yet supported by gold: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22915
But supported by bfd: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-06/msg00285.html
Support requires both compiler and linker changes.
Also [3, p151] says that to support IBT the linker should generate a IBT-enabled PLT
together with a second PLT. That is also what is implemented in bfd it seems:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-06/msg00285.html.
GCC started to supp...
2018 Mar 20
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
...HSTK (see Section 13.1.2) where return address popped from shadow stack always matches
> return address popped from normal stack.
>
> It is not yet supported by gold: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22915
> But supported by bfd: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-06/msg00285.html
>
> Support requires both compiler and linker changes.
>
> Also [3, p151] says that to support IBT the linker should generate a IBT-enabled PLT
> together with a second PLT. That is also what is implemented in bfd it seems:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-06/msg0028...