search for: msg00251

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "msg00251".

Did you mean: msg00151
2005 Nov 11
6
action redirect and dummy interface
...flowid 1:1 \ action ipt -j MARK --set-mark 1 \ action mirred egress redirect dev dummy0 and i have only tx-es on dummy0 interface no rx packets and lan machine cannot comunicate with server and vice-versa any solutions ... i readed this post http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-04/msg00251.html and i have the same config ... but :)
2019 Aug 14
2
[libnbd PATCH] lib: Consolidate free callbacks to just happen at retire time
When we introduced valid_flags, there was an incentive to do as few callbacks as possible, favoring cb(VALID|FREE) calls over the sequence cb(VALID);cb(FREE). To make it work, we set .callback=NULL after an early free, so that the later check during retirement didn't free again. But now that our .free callback is distinct from our other callbacks, there is no longer an advantage to bundling
2019 Aug 15
0
Re: [libnbd PATCH] lib: Consolidate free callbacks to just happen at retire time
...eduction in lines of code by just doing it in one place. This > basically reverts 9c8fccdf (which had slightly-questionable C > type-punning anyway) and 57150880. I didn't see this one before implementing an alternate version here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/msg00251.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/msg00253.html They're fairly similar, but I didn't get rid of the FREE_CALLBACK macro for reasons which are clearer later in the series. Rich. > --- > lib/internal.h | 14 -------------- > generato...