search for: msg00239

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "msg00239".

Did you mean: msg00238
2009 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] OT: gdb and procmod on darwin9.8/darwin10
...) Can someone at Apple provide the gdb developers with some advice on what is the new approach recommnded for gdb to have proper permissions and group ownership to function under darwin9.5.8 and darwin10? The messages discussing this issue are archived at... http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00239.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00240.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00241.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00242.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00243.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/msg00245.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-09/ms...
2006 Dec 01
1
maintain 6TB filesystem + fsck
i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html ............but not enough links for large TB arrays and ext3 :( there i...