search for: msg00210

...ile has been opened, the next file in the same directory takes 45 seconds. If the file was recently opened it returns immediately. I have raised this on several mailing lists, see: <http://lists.luv.asn.au/wws/arc/luv-main/2008-06/msg00143.html> <http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00210.html> <http://www.archivum.info/linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org/2008-06/msg00337.html> So far it would appear to be Samba is not releasing the oplock when another process tries to break it. I am not entirely convinced this is Samba's fault: <http://www.archivum.info/linux-fsdevel@...

# HG changeset patch # User hongkaixing<hongkaixing@huawei.com> # Date 1325149704 -28800 # Node ID 052727b8165ce6e05002184ae894096214c8b537 # Parent 54a5e994a241a506900ee0e197bb42e5f1d8e759 xenpaging:add a new array to speed up page-in in xenpaging This patch adds a new array named page_out_index to reserve the victim''s index. When page in a page,it has to go through a for loop

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:55AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:37:56 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Libguestfs 1.32 was released on 2016-01-06, which is over 6 months > > ago. In fact the previous stable version of libguestfs (1.30) was > > released on 2015-07-21, almost exactly 12 months ago. Are we heading > > for a 6 month release

Patches 1 & 2 are rather complex, but the end result is that we pass closures + user_data + free function in single struct parameters as I described previously in this email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/msg00210.html Patch 3 adds a convenient FREE_CALLBACK macro which seems a worthwhile simplification if you buy into 1 & 2. Patch 4 adds another macro which is less obviously useful. Rich.