search for: msg00207

...ader, not a full virtual machine. Thank you very much > for the explanation. I will try different approaches. I'm working on this, see the two threads starting at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-February/msg00205.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-February/msg00207.html Do your container images have things like: - /etc/hosts - /etc/services ? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano

Use /etc/hosts as alternative of /etc/fstab to detect whether a partition represents the root of a Linux installation; the latter might not exist in smaller/special installations like Docker images. --- Repost (refreshed) of https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-February/msg00207.html src/inspect-fs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs.c b/src/inspect-fs.c index 7f7d5d1..e9976cf 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, else if (is_dir...

...the CPU has vmx support. I have enabled "Vanderpool Technology" in BIOS. According to the xen user manual the package dev86 is needed. I am using Ubuntu 7.10. There is no dev86 package, but bin86 and bcc should work according to http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-02/msg00207.html xm info shows xen_caps: xen-3.0-x86_32p. I am missing the hvm entry. Do you have any idea why? Am I missing some kind of configuration? I couldn''t find a solution in the archives. Greetings Tom -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Mode...

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday 23 February 2016 15:21:17 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > As for the particular question about lack of /etc/fstab. Are you > > getting some kind of error when using the guestmount -i option? It > > used to be (a long time ago) that libguestfs inspection[1] could not > > handle guests that did not

This applies on top of patches 1 & 2 here (instead of patch 3): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-May/msg00206.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-May/msg00207.html Rich.

v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch series. Now these changes are moved into the first patch. This wasn't quite straightforward because I also had to...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I have rebased against current OCaml daemon patch series, modified the patch to use the new Chroot.create API, and retested....