Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "msg00205".
Did you mean:
msg00005
2016 Feb 25
0
Re: guestmount without fstab
...was to mount a container image that lacks kernel,
> fstab and bootloader, not a full virtual machine. Thank you very much
> for the explanation. I will try different approaches.
I'm working on this, see the two threads starting at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-February/msg00205.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-February/msg00207.html
Do your container images have things like:
- /etc/hosts
- /etc/services
?
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano
2006 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM / C--
...mature optimization is the root of all evil."
http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html
"That would then force us to choose a
versatile target architecture (such as PPC) and minimize
architecture-dependent optimizations."
http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~pengzhao/open64-devel/msg00205.html
Will we be able to retarget easily LLVM ?
Has it a sense to retarget a compiler ?
Nowadays, this is the holy grail, if not we will not be able to get rid of
legacy architectures ...
For example, here is cutting-edge stuff in the embedded design :
http://www.sandbridgetech.com/sandbridge_...
2017 Sep 01
1
Re: [PATCH v2] appliance: use ID_LIKE as a fallback for SUSE distro detection
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:25:17AM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > All SUSE distros have a ID_LIKE=suse, including the fake one used
> > for building that has a ID=Dummy value. Without reading ID_LIKE
> > on SUSE distros, the generated appliance packagelist is not correct.
> >
> > This fix reads
2016 Feb 23
3
Re: guestmount without fstab
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2016 15:21:17 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > As for the particular question about lack of /etc/fstab. Are you
> > getting some kind of error when using the guestmount -i option? It
> > used to be (a long time ago) that libguestfs inspection[1] could not
> > handle guests that did not
2006 Apr 14
8
[rfc] [patch] 32/64-bit hypercall interface revisited
...nsource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00078.html
[3] the alignment of long long on 32-bit x86 is 4 bytes, not 8
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00117.html
[4] the original incarnation of GUEST_HANDLE
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00205.html
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2017 Apr 23
11
[PATCH v7 0/7] Feature: Yara file scanning
v7:
- Fixes according to comments
- Rebase on top of 1.37.12
Matteo Cafasso (7):
daemon: expose file upload logic
appliance: add yara dependency
New API: yara_load
New API: yara_destroy
New API: internal_yara_scan
New API: yara_scan
yara_scan: added API tests
appliance/packagelist.in | 4 +
configure.ac | 1 +
daemon/Makefile.am