Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "msg00190".
Did you mean:
msg00090
2018 Apr 04
2
Re: error : virHashForEach:597 : Hash operation not allowed during iteration
❦ 4 avril 2018 15:19 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> :
> Both threads call virHashForEach(table=0x7f92fc69a480). Thread 6 was
> first so it starts iterating and sets table->iterating so later when
> thread 10 enters the function an error is reported.
>
> I guess we can go with what Dan suggested and after some rework we can
> just drop ->iterating
2020 Jul 06
1
Re: [PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
Hi Sam,
I was doing some work on the Python bindings, starting with removing
support for Python 2 since it's EOL. I thought I would have a look at
this patch.
So firstly I think the last version posted is:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-April/msg00190.html
My impression of this is that we shouldn't just hack the Python
bindings to make this apparently work. But I wanted to ask you a few
questions about this:
- Does the SUSE RPM output contain a mix of encodings? Or is
it all latin-1 or utf-8?
- Is there any indication of the correc...
2018 Apr 04
0
Re: error : virHashForEach:597 : Hash operation not allowed during iteration
...can go with what Dan suggested and after some rework we can
>> just drop ->iterating completely.
>
> I may have missed this suggestion. Maybe Dan only sent it to you?
No, there is another thread where this issue is discussed:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-April/msg00190.html
In the
> meantime, could I change the locks around virHashForEach() and similar
> as read/write locks?
>
You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be
accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to access
domain list from multiple thre...
2018 Apr 04
2
Re: error : virHashForEach:597 : Hash operation not allowed during iteration
❦ 4 avril 2018 15:59 +0200, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> :
>> I may have missed this suggestion. Maybe Dan only sent it to you?
>
> No, there is another thread where this issue is discussed:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-April/msg00190.html
>
> In the
>> meantime, could I change the locks around virHashForEach() and similar
>> as read/write locks?
>>
>
> You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be
> accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to ac...
2020 Jun 03
2
Re: [PATCH v3] python: Fix UnicodeError in inspect_list_applications2() (RHBZ#1684004)
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> > The python3 bindings create PyUnicode objects from application strings
> > on the guest (i.e. installed rpm, deb packages).
> > It is documented that rpm package fields such as description should be
> > utf8 encoded