Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "msg00179".
Did you mean:
msg00176
2014 Jan 31
1
Re: [virt-tools-list] Next virt-manager release?
...s list, CCing it.]
>
> On 01/31/2014 03:17 AM, Daniel Lipsitt wrote:
> > Does anybody know if there are plans to tag a new release of
> > virt-manager any time soon? That would help with distro packaging.
> >
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2014-January/msg00179.html
As Cole said in that mail, in "next couple of weeks", but exact
information can be given only by himself. However, IMHO there's no
plan to hold on to.
Martin
2007 Mar 06
2
flac files playable in iTunes 5.0.1 ?
Hi,
Is the recent version 0.1.5 (08.05.2006) of XiphQT compatible with
iTunes 5.0.1 and Mac OSX 10.4? I am trying to get flac files to play
in my iTunes and hope I don't have to upgrade iTunes and get all the
junk that comes with it. i already have ogg support, so this is an
incremental improvement.
-- Thanks,
Jerry
2007 Mar 23
0
flac files playable in iTunes 5.0.1 ?
...t provide) to import and decode Oggs then iTunes is able
to use them. Unfortunately, iTunes does not seem to have anything
hardcoded about FLAC file format or extensions, and not because of the
lack of requests - see the last part of this post:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/QuickTime-API/2004/Jul/msg00179.html
That means: even if you have a FLAC decoder, which XiphQT provides,
and a native FLAC file format importer, which can be found at:
http://people.xiph.org/~arek/flac_import/
iTunes will still refuse to use it to play FLAC files. You can cheat
and get it working at the moment, see:
http://barely...
2014 Jan 30
2
Next virt-manager release?
Does anybody know if there are plans to tag a new release of virt-manager any time soon? That would help with distro packaging.
2006 Oct 26
2
Openldap 2.3 very very slow under Xen 3.0.2 ... why ?
...ldap 2.3 inside a debian etch domU.
Openldap is very very slow with db4.2, 4.3, ... and I dont'' why ???
I''ve updated my libc6 to a friendly xen version too ...
but nothing !
I''ve found a post about this issue
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-02/msg00179.html
Any ideas to solve this issue ?
Regards
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2016 Mar 19
2
Redundant load in llvm's codegen compares to gcc when accessing escaped pointer?
Agree, and I did : )
Please refer to this mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-03/msg00179.html
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> I suspect you should just go ask #1 on the gcc mailing list and see what
> the answer is.
> We are basically trying to figure out their reasoning, but we should
> instead just go ask what it is...
2016 Mar 18
4
Redundant load in llvm's codegen compares to gcc when accessing escaped pointer?
1. Same question as David, why &c - 8 is invalid? Is it related to below
statements In C99 standard?
6.5.3.3:
"Among the invalid values for dereferencing a pointer by the unary *
operator are a null pointer, an
address inappropriately aligned for the type of object pointed to, and the
address of an object after the
end of its lifetime."
2. We are trying to preserve 1st load and