search for: msg00169

On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 19:29:07 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > v7 was: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html > > I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Patches #1-13 LGTM (just with a small fixup needed in patch #7). > Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images > processed with...

Hi, I need to create an application where I can use a single interface for different VMs (libvirt becomes an obvious choice then). However I will need to control a VM running on custom hypervisor other than ones currently supported by libvirt. Is it possible to add a new interface to the hypervisor (easily)? Shall I try to use "test-hypervisor" supported by libvirt ?? I shall be

Hi there, Last night I was trying to start a HVM domU via stubdom-dm device model. Initially I did not receive any error to stdout when I did so with Xen-3.4.2. My Xen-3.4.2 installation works fine with qemu-dm (or regular HVM guests). The stubdom-dm guest I was trying to create did not really operate as I was unable to connect to the VNC console. The output of xm list showed the DomU was there,

Hi there, Last night I was trying to start a HVM domU via stubdom-dm device model. Initially I did not receive any error to stdout when I did so with Xen-3.4.2. My Xen-3.4.2 installation works fine with qemu-dm (or regular HVM guests). The stubdom-dm guest I was trying to create did not really operate as I was unable to connect to the VNC console. The output of xm list showed the DomU was there,

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one whic...

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any differences. Rich. [*] Except that "name" labels on disks are ignored. This requires a bit of complica...