search for: msg00045

Hello List, Seems like blockcopy --wait doesn't work work qemu-2.2.x. I found someone else having the same problem, but it never went anywhere: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-January/msg00045.html I went ahead and did some more debugging and created a bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210903 I'm going to do some more debugging and hopefully figure this out, but wanted it to post it here so that it gets more attention. Thanks, schu

Adapt the globbing part from the old --remote-path work previously proposed for sysprep [1], allowing --delete to perform globbing when deleting paths. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-October/msg00045.html --- sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml b/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml index de78a87..59d5485 100644 --- a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml +++ b/sysprep/sysprep_operation_dele...

...n" .size .L.cst.3, 20 .section ".note.GNU-stack","", at progbits $ clang hello.s.s $ ./a.out Leslie Zhai: Hello World 1 WIP: * fix issues https://github.com/xiangzhai/dragonegg/issues * gengtype not support macro https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-07/msg00045.html -- Regards, Leslie Zhai - a LLVM developer https://reviews.llvm.org/p/xiangzhai/

...riday 10 April 2015 13:07:38 Matthew Schumacher wrote: > Hello List, > > Seems like blockcopy --wait doesn't work work qemu-2.2.x. > > I found someone else having the same problem, but it never went anywhere: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-January/msg00045.html > > I went ahead and did some more debugging and created a bug report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210903 > > I'm going to do some more debugging and hopefully figure this out, but > wanted it to post it here so that it gets more attention. Tha...

...:38 Matthew Schumacher wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> Seems like blockcopy --wait doesn't work work qemu-2.2.x. >> >> I found someone else having the same problem, but it never went anywhere: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-January/msg00045.html >> >> I went ahead and did some more debugging and created a bug report: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210903 >> >> I'm going to do some more debugging and hopefully figure this out, but >> wanted it to post it here so that it...

It appears that this bug in data=journal mode, https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2005-February/msg00045.html isn't fixed in 2.6.11.11. Andrew, I've CC'd you since you have previously looked at this specific issue. I'm seeing this problem on dual-Opteron x86-64 boxes serving NFS + Samba3 to a few dozen clients; it takes several hours at high load to reproduce. We have not tested 2.6...

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:19:12PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Adapt the globbing part from the old --remote-path work previously > proposed for sysprep [1], allowing --delete to perform globbing when > deleting paths. > > [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-October/msg00045.html > --- > sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml b/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml > index de78a87..59d5485 100644 > --- a/sysprep/sysprep_operation_delete.ml &...

Hi All, I have a question, Today i had read a mail regarding LLVM in gcc mailing list(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00045.html) in which it is wriiten that it is difficult to present souce code information through LLVM bytecode as it is three-address code style, Is it really difficult? Thanks and Regards Manish

...n \ > --buildtype=debug \ > -Drunstatedir=%{_rundir} \ > %{?arg_qemu} \ > ... There is no need to do anything for spec file, see the patch I posted to libvir-list [1]. Pavel [1] <https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2020-September/msg00045.html>

On a Tuesday in 2020, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:13:39PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: >> On a Tuesday in 2020, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 02:34:56AM +0200, Toolybird wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Just a heads up on my experiences with the new build system. >> > > >> > > Arch Linux

This is the libguestfs companion patch to: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-September/msg00045.html Rich.