Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "msecure".
Did you mean:
secure
2012 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
...distros are using.
The old 32-bit PLT code used to generatie a branch/return to the GOT
and the updated LR value was used to gain addressability to the GOT.
The problem is that the GOT is in the date section, so for that to
work, the data section of your program had to be marked executable.
With -msecure-plt (the new default for all new distros), that is
no longer the case. Maybe the non secure-plt code isn't playing
well with the system crt*.o files and libs?
Are there build directions for building LLVM for ppc/ppc64?
I thought I had read that clang didn't work for ppc/ppc64 and that
you...
2012 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:55:13 -0500
Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:46:02 -0500
> Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:19:13 -0500
> > Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 20:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > > Thanks! Do you
2012 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Odd PPC inline asm constraint
...The old 32-bit PLT code used to generatie a branch/return to the GOT
> and the updated LR value was used to gain addressability to the GOT.
> The problem is that the GOT is in the date section, so for that to
> work, the data section of your program had to be marked executable.
> With -msecure-plt (the new default for all new distros), that is
> no longer the case. Maybe the non secure-plt code isn't playing
> well with the system crt*.o files and libs?
>
> Are there build directions for building LLVM for ppc/ppc64?
> I thought I had read that clang didn't work f...