search for: mscsoftwar

Is it possible to suspend this user from getting mail for a week otherwise we are going to get loads of "out of office" reports??????? Cheers -----Original Message----- From: brian.casey@mscsoftware.com [mailto:brian.casey@mscsoftware.com] Sent: 22 January 2003 13:34 To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] I am out of the office. I will be out of the office starting 01/21/2003 and will not return until 01/28/2003. I will respond to your message when I return. If you have questions reg...

...anager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. Ph. 586-254-5800 Fx. 586-254-5804 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Yeager [mailto:pyeager@tektone.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:21 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org; Kristyan Osborne; Robert Adkins Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: Re: [Samba] brian.casey@mscsoftware.com - Out of office I sure *hope* so! Perhaps if folks who inflicted such things on the list were just suspended until they requested reinstatement, folks might get a hint! Is there anything in the mail header that might identify automatic replies as such, and could be used to filter them?...

...00007fff88788830 error 4 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: Georg.Koltermann@mscsoftware.com QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org hunter[111]$ rsync -aAH --delete . /tmp/gwk rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (2430 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(454) [sender=2.6.9] hunter[112]$ dmesg | tail -1 [ 9674.001620] rs...

Hi All, We are running Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 5.7 server. It is registered with WINS under 3 different names ("netbios name" and two "netbios aliases"). Two of the names always work fine. We can do "net view" against those names and they always respond with correct list of shares and always allow proper connections to those shares. For some reason the third

Here is my situation: I have an AIX 4.3.3 machine, that I have compiled open-ldap, kerberos5 (1.3..6), and Samba 3.0.20. Here is my smb.conf file: [global] realm = REGION.DOMAIN.COM security = ADS password server = randomdc.region.domain.com workgroup = REGION client use spnego = yes ;winbind separator = \ [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = no create mode = 0750

Hi, ok I know zfs-fuse is still incomplete and performance has not been considered, but still, before I''m going to use it for my /home I wanted a rough estimate. Another benchmark already asserted that zfs by itself, on Solaris, is a very fast beast (http://cmynhier.blogspot.com/2006/05/zfs-benchmarking.html), faster than ext3 on Linux and also faster than UFS. Interestingly UFS seems