Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "msa2040_samba_storag".
Did you mean:
msa2040_samba_storage
2019 Jan 03
3
Windows ACLs on share
...gt;> observation, maybe important:
>
> Oh, it's more than important, guess where the Windows ACLs are stored
> ;-)
hmm ... ? ;)
>> (share "projekte" works fine, share "QM" not)
>
> are they both using the same filesystem, ownership etc ?
Yes.
# MSA2040_SAMBA_storage
/dev/sdc1 /mnt/MSA2040 ext4 noatime 0 1
both shares are subdirs of /mnt/MSA2040/smb
drwxrwxrwx+ 32 root qm 4096 3. Jän 11:48 Projekte
drwxr-x--- 47 root dom�nen-benutzer 4096 3. Jän 14:43 QM
That mismatch of owner group comes from my desparate fiddling ...
2019 Jan 03
0
Windows ACLs on share
...s more than important, guess where the Windows ACLs are
> > stored ;-)
>
> hmm ... ? ;)
>
> >> (share "projekte" works fine, share "QM" not)
> >
> > are they both using the same filesystem, ownership etc ?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> # MSA2040_SAMBA_storage
> /dev/sdc1 /mnt/MSA2040 ext4
> noatime 0 1
>
>
> both shares are subdirs of /mnt/MSA2040/smb
>
> drwxrwxrwx+ 32 root qm 4096 3. Jän 11:48 Projekte
>
>
> drwxr-x--- 47 root dom�nen-benutzer 4096 3. Jän 14:43 QM
>
>
> That mis...
2019 Jan 03
2
Windows ACLs on share
Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100
> "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of
>> doing this to Windows ACLs:
>>
>> disable "valid users" "write list" etc
>>