Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "mrs_ar".
Did you mean:
mri_ar
2013 Jul 17
1
[LLVMdev] Help with subtarget features and context-dependent asm parsers
...the active sub target isn't what it's looking for. Would that be sufficient here?
It doesn't look like there are different encodings for the same string
so I don't think even that would be necessary. How about partitioning
by MRS_APSR and MRS_OtherM instead of the current MRS_M and MRS_AR?
I'll see if I can put a patch together.
Tim.
2013 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] Help with subtarget features and context-dependent asm parsers
On Jul 17, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes:
>>> /tmp/foo.s:1:2: error: instruction requires: distinct-ops
>>> sllk %r2,%r3,1
>>> ^
>>
>> That seems like it would be a good improvement for all targets.
>
> Thanks, sounds
2013 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Help with subtarget features and context-dependent asm parsers
Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes:
>> /tmp/foo.s:1:2: error: instruction requires: distinct-ops
>> sllk %r2,%r3,1
>> ^
>
> That seems like it would be a good improvement for all targets.
Thanks, sounds like it might be more acceptable than I thought :-)
>> ARM seems to rely on the current MatchOperandParserImpl() behaviour,