search for: mroofka

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mroofka".

2006 Mar 28
13
Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp
...do to make it working? My post on the gentoo forum http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-447016.html here is more information but I belive that the main problem is shown here --> the wrong src ip and/ or static gw. I''m sorry for my english, I know it''s bad. Pozdrawiam Szymon Mroofka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jak sie go pozbyc? >>> http://link.interia.pl/f191a
2006 Aug 23
3
How to select Skype traffic??
Hi, I have simple question about Skype. What are the methods of selecting packets which belongs to Skype?? I know about 7layer but I don''t belive that is only way. Is 7layer realy good and stable solution for routers which must handle more than 1000 users ? Thanks in advance Pozdrawiam Szymon Turkiewicz
2006 May 13
4
Simple routing question from networking newbie
I''ve recently got a new modem. In fact, it''s a modem-router with NAT functionality. Before I had a plain modem-modem, and I was able to access my workstation from my remote server using the IP address assigned to me by my ISP. Now however, that IP address only reaches the modem-router and the IP address of my workstation is set by my modem-router to 192.168.0.2 How can I
2006 Mar 29
3
Re: Load-banancing. two ip''s from one isp - solution
...#39;'m using 2.5.15 kernel without patch of Julian Anastasov and load-balancing is working. lartc split-access how to and http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt now both are working fine Now I will try to use fwmark based routing and propably I will write with next problem soon :P Pozdrawiam Szymon Mroofka
2006 Mar 31
0
rule fwmark desn''t work for local packets (output chain)
Witam wszystkich After few days with yours help I''ve succeeded with setup of load-balancing. Now I have problem with next step. I want to mark some packets and than put them to the one of the routing tables to force them going via only one interface with only one ip. Easy?? Ofcourse, but not for me :(. I''m NOT using NAT. Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 71 packets, 24227