search for: mrobti

On 2016-10-25 06:51, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 25.10.2016 09:43, mrobti at insiberia.net wrote: >> I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir >> very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in >> one INBOX when used in webmail. >> >> I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders...

On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: > Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >> >>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >> and >>>> subscribed for them. >>>> >>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace >> inbox" >&gt...

PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own pdns installation? I prefer to avoid this but I need up-to-date features. Perhaps there is a PowerDNS specific work-around? Maybe the EPEL

I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in one INBOX when used in webmail. I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. Is there a server-side way to safely move messages into new subfolders so that Dovecot indexes and UIDs won't break? If I write a shell script to move

Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du`

On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>> >>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>>> and >>>>>> subscribed for them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is is possible to return an override for the defaul...

>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created and >> subscribed for them. >> >> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace inbox" >> containing the needed mailbox definitions in the userdb lookup for >> such users? If so, how would the userdb lookup result be formatted? >> Presumably as > >

On 14.03.2017 05:57, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: >>> On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >>>> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>>>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> subscribed for them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is...

I know there's a couple third party repos offering PHP 7 for Centos. I prefer not to add too much third party that I don't have to and PHP 7 has been mainstream for some time now, I thought maybe it would be in EPEL by now. What is the most recommended and stable way to get an up to date PHP on Centos 7?

--On Friday, December 08, 2017 7:54 PM +0000 MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net> wrote: > PowerDNS supports CAA records beginning with version 4.0, but the pdns > package in EPEL for most recent centos versions is stuck at around > version 3.4 (3.4.11 is what I have). > > Do I have no other choice but to manually compile and maintain my own...

on centos 7 I tried to install banshee from EPEL yum install banshee gotting this error: Error: Package: banshee-2.6.2-11.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgpod-sharp >= 0.8.2 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest seems known problem but ignored to fix it in a year or more:

On 25.10.2016 09:43, mrobti at insiberia.net wrote: > I have inherited a 10+ GB mailbox which dsync converted to maildir > very nicely. But 15GB in tens of thousands of messages is too much in > one INBOX when used in webmail. > > I guess it's best to divide the messages into subfolders for date. > >...

How can I query the current pigeonhole version from a running instance to verify it is what I expect? Possible to get `dovecot --version` to show things like that?

Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: > >>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >and >>> subscribed for them. >>> >>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace >inbox" >>> containing the needed m...

On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: > On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>> >>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder created >>> and >>>>> subscribed for them. >>>>> >>>>> Is is possible to return an override for the default "namespace >...

> > On 03 Feb 2019, at 22:07, MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net> wrote: > > Hi, I originally picked mdbox because I had the impression from reading about it on the mailing list that it was more performant and that it would conserve disc space. > > But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean,...

On 2017-03-13 13:40, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 2017-03-13 19:31, MRob wrote: >> On 2017-03-10 23:28, MRob wrote: >>> On 2017-03-10 23:22, Christian Kivalo wrote: >>>> Am 11. M?rz 2017 08:04:28 MEZ schrieb MRob <mrobti at insiberia.net>: >>>>> >>>>>>> We have a need for some users to have an additional folder >>>>>>> created >>>>> and >>>>>>> subscribed for them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>...

I have an old mbox formatted INBOX and folders that need to be converted to a Maildir. Can I run the dsync command when the server is live and Dovecot LMTP is delivering new mails to the same user? Will it be able to preserve UIDs and not confuse any indexes? I started the job with deliveries disabled so the conversion could complete, but it's taking too long. I want to know if I can

I was under the impression that Dovecot does not look at .forward by default, since of course, Sieve is where that kind of logic should go. However, I'm seeing a .forward file being honoured by the LMTP delivery agent. Is this to be expected?

Hello, is there a way to edit a message header using doveadm? I see how I can fetch the things I need, but even if I can't edit in place; if I extract the full message, edit it, there doesn't seem to be a way to append it back again?