search for: mpr8tvtnvn4

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "mpr8tvtnvn4".

2018 Jun 01
2
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...eply to >> James Knight, I don't think we should block on getting a section number >> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >> proposal. >> > > I've sent the proposal: https://groups.google.com/foru > m/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 > Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file size and link time impact of a few other representations for the address-significance table. My results are here: https://groups.google. com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4/30Z0_KHMAQAJ One of the proposals (a compressed...
2018 May 23
0
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...ric-abi. As I mentioned in my reply to > James Knight, I don't think we should block on getting a section number > assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that > proposal. > I've sent the proposal: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 Peter > > Peter > > > >> Happy to help out with reviews. >> >> Peter >> >> >> On 22 May 2018 at 23:06, Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Context:...
2018 Jun 01
0
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...Knight, I don't think we should block on getting a section number >>> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >>> proposal. >>> >> >> I've sent the proposal: >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 >> > > Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file > size and link time impact of a few other representations for the > address-significance table. My results are here: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4/30Z0_KHMAQAJ > &gt...
2018 Jun 01
1
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...we should block on getting a section number >>>> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >>>> proposal. >>>> >>> >>> I've sent the proposal: https://groups.google.com/ >>> forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 >>> >> >> Based on feedback from the generic-abi thread I looked at the object file >> size and link time impact of a few other representations for the >> address-significance table. My results are here: https://groups.google. >> com/d/msg/generic-abi/MPr8TVtn...
2018 May 23
4
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I think that the approach of using a section to record address > significance is a good one. I'm guessing it will have its own section > type and format? If it does would it make sense to try and submit this > to the GABI https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generic-abi as
2018 May 24
1
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...my reply to >> James Knight, I don't think we should block on getting a section number >> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >> proposal. > > > I've sent the proposal: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 > > Peter Thanks. I agree we shouldn't require it to be in the GABI before proceeding. I think making the proposal more visible to the wider community will already have been worthwhile. In the absence of a GABI defined way to tell if an ELF processing tool may have broken the symbol tab...
2018 May 24
2
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...reply to >> James Knight, I don't think we should block on getting a section number >> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >> proposal. >> > > I've sent the proposal: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 > > The proposal looks decent. I'll probably comment more once I (like the others) get a chance to read more deeply. I've also taken a look at the basic patches - one request is that since this is newly standardizing bits that you make sure to comment or even put a detailed standards-...
2018 May 24
0
Proposal for address-significance tables for --icf=safe
...night, I don't think we should block on getting a section number >>> assignment, but we can at least incorporate any design feedback from that >>> proposal. >>> >> >> I've sent the proposal: https://groups.google.com/ >> forum/#!topic/generic-abi/MPr8TVtnVn4 >> >> > The proposal looks decent. I'll probably comment more once I (like the > others) get a chance to read more deeply. I've also taken a look at the > basic patches - one request is that since this is newly standardizing bits > that you make sure to comment or ev...
2020 Jun 24
2
[Debuginfo][DWARF][LLD] Remove obsolete debug info in lld.
Thanks for copying me in Paul! Sorry, for the late reply. I have had a personal interest in this subject for a long time and I have had discussions on linking DWARF with many of you in person at LLVM events. I don't have much to add to what's upthread and James Henderson has already answered the questions I was copied in for. However, I did want to make a general point about ELF that I