search for: mpath_prio_rdac

...pathing. Correct? > is: > device { > vendor IBM > product 1726-4xx > path_checker rdac > features 1 queue_if_no_path > hardware_handler 1 rdac > prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n > no_path_retry 300 > rr_min_io 1000 > } The right settings are documented here: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Yoi should be a little more specific about the conflict you see. > The V3700 is still complaining and I note...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...>> device { >> vendor IBM >> product 1726-4xx >> path_checker rdac >> features 1 queue_if_no_path >> hardware_handler 1 rdac >> prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n >> no_path_retry 300 >> rr_min_io 1000 >> } > >The right settings are documented here: > >https://access.redhat.com/solutions/85223 Thanks, I shall investigate. The stanza I've used was the one that multipath its...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

...I've done that but the default configuration for the DS3400s is: device { vendor IBM product 1726-4xx path_checker rdac features 1 queue_if_no_path hardware_handler 1 rdac prio_callout /sbin/mpath_prio_rdac /dev/%n no_path_retry 300 rr_min_io 1000 } The V3700 is still complaining and I note the "path checker rdac" and mpath_prio_rdac lines. Is this rdac the same as IBM's RDAC, and if so how can I get rid of it? OS is CentOS 5.3 (yes, I know - upg...

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in