search for: mpact

...force the use of that script via the sshd_config Subsystem directive. I'm using the internal-sftp server, because it's a chrooted setup. Not sure this can easily be done with this setup Thanks, Fran?ois > > > > On 30 Mar 2023, at 22:43, Fran?ois Ouellet <franco at sol.mpact.tv> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We need to limit concurrent sftp logins to one per user (because of bad > > > client behaviour). Is there any way to achieve this I have overlooked? > > > > > > It seems it could be possible...

> On 03 Apr 2023, at 15:38, Fran?ois Ouellet <franco at sol.mpact.tv> wrote: > > I'm using the internal-sftp server, because it's a chrooted setup. > Not sure this can easily be done with this setup Yes, I know it's not OpenSSH, I'm just a happy user, but seriously for this use case, consider CrushFTP, or ProFTPd for the opernsourc...

...inal sessions You could use an sftp-server wrapper script that creates a lock file/dir or another way to detect if a connection is already present, and then force the use of that script via the sshd_config Subsystem directive. > > On 30 Mar 2023, at 22:43, Fran?ois Ouellet <franco at sol.mpact.tv> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We need to limit concurrent sftp logins to one per user (because of bad > > client behaviour). Is there any way to achieve this I have overlooked? > > > > It seems it could be possible with pam_limits, if sftp sessions...

Hi, We need to limit concurrent sftp logins to one per user (because of bad client behaviour). Is there any way to achieve this I have overlooked? It seems it could be possible with pam_limits, if sftp sessions were recorded in utmp (a guess from what I found googling around). If I configure /etc/security/limits.conf with testuser hard maxlogins 1 and connect with ssh, and try a second

Le Saturday, 1 April 2023, 02:06:04 EDT Philipp Marek a ?crit : > Set a max-process ulimit in /etc/security/limits.conf (using a group specification). > > For internal sftp 1, for external 2, I guess. I'v seen this suggested before and I have tried it then. It doesn't work with this particular config. I don't know why yet. It works when I don't use the internal-sftp

...mbin.g to o v.e.r $2.0'0 w*i't-h n e'w+s+. Pr,ess Releas_e: Chin*a YouTV'.s CnBo-o W+e,b S.i.t e Ra,nks N+o'.'1 on Mi'croso_ft L i'v+e S+earch En+gine C nBoo Traff_ic Inc rea*ses 4*9-% O,v*e,r T'w+o Mon.ths R,e a'd t h+e new,s, th_ink abou-t t+h,e i,mpact, and j_u.m.p on t.h i s firs t thi*ng To.-morrow mornin' g! $0.*42 is a g'i+f't at t*h*i's price..'_... Do y'o*u,r homew_*ork a-n d watc,h t h i*s t*rade Monda y morning,.

...cu|ation of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resu|ting from such compensation due to the fact that this is a paid advertisement and is not without bias.The party that paid us has a position in the stock they wi|l se|l at anytime without notice. This could have a negative i mpact on the price of the stock. Al| factua| information in this report was gathered from pub|ic sources, inc|uding but not limited to Company Websites and Company Press Releases. The pub|isher of this news|etter believes this information to be reliable but can make no guaranteee as to its accuracy or co...

...with recording something fake like "sftp" in ut_line > but that caused problems as none of the other tools were set up to > accept it. Is there an archive of the discussion of the problems it brings to the other tools? I'd like to understand the issues. What other tools are impacted? If I don't need them, would it be possible to think about adding an option to enter fake utmp entries for interal-sftp sessions (or any other subsystem, I'm only seeing my own little problem here)? Could I find some code from those tests from some time ago and apply it locally? Was...