search for: movk

...ext+0x8): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against symbol `foo' define in *ABS* section in a.exe The question is: do I miss some options or pragmas during compilation ? Should I expect llvm to emit the following code? movz x8, #:abs_g3:foo movk x8, #:abs_g2_nc:foo movk x8, #:abs_g1_nc:foo movk x8, #:abs_g0_nc:foo ldr x8, [x8] blr x8 or I miss some flag during linking? PS. The above test works fine with arm v7 targart. (clang emits &qu...

Hello LLVM, I'm playing with a new ISD::OPAQUE instruction to make hoisting first class and eliminate a lot of tweaky flag setting/checking around opaque constants. It's going well for the IR and x86, but I now I need to sort out details for all the other targets. To start, can someone please advise on the AAarch64 equivalent of these X86 patterns? // Opaque values become mov immediate

Hi, I am trying to execute a simple hello world program compiled like so: path/to/compiled/clang -o test --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -march=armv8.5-a -fsanitize=hwaddress --sysroot=/usr/aarch64-linux-gnu/ -L/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/10.1.0/ -g test.c However, when I look at the disassembly, there is an unknown instruction listed at 0x2d51c: 000000000002d4c0 main: 2d4c0: ff c3 00 d1

...ebb?@gkb49%+r7n|4UWPeE zcZ&;q75}BkRV1d*Y}zTWDP`L(2+$g9ckvm-I^8<08jJdLw{*Rzrh at h??p~zJdURPs zYQK^q(G}F&y>FkQl!QkUDcuH?^zU2Z8PKmgnsl4*90tgb6)7ke>zODPTSdIM4|J@! zJGX9QsL(wso*w9uu1l&5brxFvb_y$F_B*?<U%y_(-4cbF6=wr&dAd>8fFi-tySUUP zZ%L6=?T at 6H-HjGbP5eA(&VRp>zPDiA^moVK$5O1Lff><(*w?Y<oo)ijT^vVAiNC!I z>%v0_yRAz+Y3Nc+r%0r4^VMgXsd%5mffW=MUt3b`dpPqoORiXjb+s40b8cSy>*w{b zvpjlRknjJsQ+T*l?f-bq5zYxW+CXZL;$Bdo-i7^y82dHxi05s-&@f+x$74P?#Oie8 zY!j8TEAAV+Au at _eO8S;K>@V?>*Pbp{+=q5vZoaW;QW5_WwAA{5X)ZC}fExeb>*RGC z1-aVo4-c&JW7DhkmiwIHy0UP at AF0C...