Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "movablepag".
Did you mean:
movablepage
2019 Oct 23
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...driver
> c) The driver increments the reference count of the PageOffline pages
> in MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE. One issue might be that the pages are no longer
> isolated once we get that call. Might be ok.
Only previous PageBuddy pages are returned to the allocator IIRC. Mostly
because of MovablePage()
> d) How to make __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() succeed?
> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcount == 0)?
Yep
> e) How to make __offline_isolated_pages() succeed?
> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcount == 0)?
Simply skip over PageOfflin...
2019 Oct 23
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...driver
> c) The driver increments the reference count of the PageOffline pages
> in MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE. One issue might be that the pages are no longer
> isolated once we get that call. Might be ok.
Only previous PageBuddy pages are returned to the allocator IIRC. Mostly
because of MovablePage()
> d) How to make __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() succeed?
> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcount == 0)?
Yep
> e) How to make __offline_isolated_pages() succeed?
> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcount == 0)?
Simply skip over PageOfflin...
2019 Oct 23
0
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...r increments the reference count of the PageOffline pages
>> in MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE. One issue might be that the pages are no longer
>> isolated once we get that call. Might be ok.
>
> Only previous PageBuddy pages are returned to the allocator IIRC. Mostly
> because of MovablePage()
>
>> d) How to make __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock() succeed?
>> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcount == 0)?
>
> Yep
>
>> e) How to make __offline_isolated_pages() succeed?
>> Like I propose in this patch (PageOffline() + refcou...
2019 Oct 22
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place
> > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.
2019 Oct 22
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place
> > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.