search for: mounce

...ssible, NETunnelProvider. It was not looking like a simple port though, a lot of glue required to get it to a state Apple would approve. This had been on my list of projects to attempt if I could find the time and energy to commit to it. If you do port it I would be very interested! Regards, Ryan Mounce On 26 July 2017 at 20:54, Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: > +1, waiting for this for quite a while. > > Paul Chobert <paul at chobert.fr>于2017年7月26日 周三下午7:23写道： >> >> Hi, >> >> Is there any existing solution to install iOS9 on unjailbroken...

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: eldad hadas <eldadh at hadasbros.com> Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:19 PM Subject: i am having some hard time compiling tinc 1.1 for openwrt To: guus at tinc-vpn.org Hello, i am having some hard time compiling tinc 1.1 for openwrt. i have found a precomiled version for ar71xx, but i need for mips_24kc and ramips/mt7620 i have tried afew

We knew the TCP-BBR developed by google and try to optimize the transport efficiency of TCP, I’m wondering will this be beneficial if we put tinc in TCP mode plus the TCP-BBR?

...understand the concern of uncertain for TCP-over-TCP by BBR, as the BBR is natively designed to optimize TCP, instead of TCP-over-TCP, but could you articulate a bit more about the beneficial of “sending host when there is a UDP tinc tunnel” in the middle”? > On 30 Sep 2017, at 11:23 AM, Ryan Mounce <ryan at mounce.com.au> wrote: > > I'm not aware that BBR claims nor attempts to resolve any of the > inherent issues with TCP-over-TCP. This should still be avoided if > possible. > > TCP BBR would be beneficial if configured on the sending host when > there is a U...

Hi, Is there any existing solution to install iOS9 on unjailbroken iOS devices ? If there is none, I'm thinking of porting tinc to iOS, I haven't looked at the source code much but I should be able to create a NetworkExtension for tinc. Thank you, Paul. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I include 1.1 in my personal LEDE builds by adding the following to the makefile, in addition to changing the version: https://github.com/rmounce/openwrt-packages/commit/bd69c5dcd4428f2684e023462f23ec2dc7095041 +libncurses +libreadline + --with-curses \ + --with-readline Regards, Ryan Mounce On 18 December 2017 at 06:41, eldad hadas <eldadh at hadasbros.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: eldad...

I'm not aware that BBR claims nor attempts to resolve any of the inherent issues with TCP-over-TCP. This should still be avoided if possible. TCP BBR would be beneficial if configured on the sending host when there is a UDP tinc tunnel in the middle. On 29 September 2017 at 19:34, Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: > We knew the TCP-BBR developed by google and try to