search for: motorola

Hi all, On the Wiki it says something about the motorola WiFi/GSM hybrid phone, the Motorola CN620. Don't know whether that one ever made it to the market or not, but I read a review on c|net about another upcoming model, the A910. The A910 is Linux-based, and offers WiFi on top of GSM, GPRS and Bluetooth. You can see the picture at http://asia....

...e way. Why would one compile work, but not the other? I would like to migrate to the newer version, since it has some security fixes. Is there something I need to do during compile, or is this a runtime configuration thing? Thanks in advance, Steve -- Steve "Wheat" Belt Motorola, Inc. Steve.Belt at motorola.com 6501 William Cannon Dr. West, MD OE341 512-895-2268 Austin, TX 78735

I got a call from an ISP friend tonight who said he is getting calls from people who are getting signed up with Vonage. Instead of sending them ATA186s, apparently they're receiving something made by Motorola. They apparently work significantly differently than the Cisco units, and there have been some problems. Anybody know anything further? Thx. B.

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the Motorola Q has its Bluetooth always on like the IPhone? I want to use the Motorola Q in a Proximity Detection setup like that described on nerdvittles.com. I know the Treo 650 does not work well since the display must be on for the bluetooth to be on and this eats power. Thanks Chuck Bunn

----- Forwarded message from Pedigo Michael-G17060 <Michael.Pedigo@motorola.com> ----- From: Pedigo Michael-G17060 <Michael.Pedigo@motorola.com> To: "'samba@samba.org'" <samba@samba.org> Subject: Core Dump issue with Solaris8 and 2.2.8a Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:40:16 -0500 Hello, I am NOT an advanced UNIX admin and am fairly new to Sam...

I have a mini-USB cable, but simply connecting a Motorola RAZR to a Linux (Centos 6) PC to download stored pictures doesn't work, at least not automatically. Any idea what I need to do to get Centos to recognize that a Motorola RAZR V3 is plugged in as a USB device? (I don't have a data plan on this phone - I'm just trying to get archive...

Hello, I start trying to use a USB dongle and a Bluetooth GSM phone to make GSM call with asterisk using the BLT channel provided by the GSM phone. Unfortunately I get a "Everyone is busy/congested at this time" whenever I try to Dial("IAX2/****@****/2", "BLT/MotorolaLara/3474501***") For sure I make some mistake in the configuration. Unfortunately I don't find any step-by-step guide to configure USB-Dongle + Asterisk + chan_bluetooth What channel I have to use? If I try the following command as specified on the configuration file /etc/asterisk# sd...

Hi all, I've just acquired a few Motorola OJO units, and am looking at testing them out with Asterisk. Having read the Ojo spec it seems they use an 'enhanced' version of h.264, which I believe is supported to some extent under 1.4 (?). Amongst other things, it seems that the Ojo allows for custom frame rates and picture sizes, o...

Hi Everyone, Can anyone share their experience with Motorola Canopy solution deployment and Asterisk? Is this a good fit? Thanks, Bruce -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100817/09e5cb7b/attachment.htm

...clck of only 25MHz, I don even understand why > they bother to make a DSP like that... > > John Villar escreveu: > >> Hello, does anyone knows how performs the fixed point version of >> Speex in "embedded" controllers? i'm referring to PIC16F84 and >> Motorola alike microcontrollers. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Speex-dev mailing list >> Speex-dev@xiph.org >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Nam...

Hi All, Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review to reflect this change. I'm also asking for everyone's help to review all...

Hello! On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, > "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and > "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review > to reflect this change. Are there any news on this? The M68k build...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 3620 bytes Desc: dfs.ht1.jpg Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060626/d12d4001/attachment.jpeg

Dear All Do you have any experience with hardware emulator for Motorola PowerQuicc on MS Windows host (dedicated for centos installation)? Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100606/c19e6f33/attachment-0001.html>

Hello! I can't connect my motorola phone with p2k programs. How can I do that without virtualbox or windows? If thats not possible, can I apply some options to make wine understand usb devices, while compiling?

Might any one have a pre-compile of samba for the old DGUX Motorola platform left anywhere? Thanks Tom

I have a small pile of them from customers who were too lazy to send them back after switching to our local voice service... Is there any hope of ever using these things with Asterisk? Vonage does not want them back and they won't unlock them either. A terrible shame! Should I just toss them? Steve

...experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? On 13/11/2020 22:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello! > > On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: >> Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, >> "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and >> "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review >> to reflect this change. > Are there any news on this...

Hi Min! On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Showing the prerequisites to become an experimental target and eventually, > an official target. We're currently struggling on setting up the buildbot > but I believe Adrian (CC-ed) is working on that. So I hope the patches can > be sorted out while waiting for the buildbot. The m68k machine is actually already up and running, I

On 11/15/20 9:33 PM, Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev wrote: > As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the > M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a > "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? Sounds good. I'll file that bug tomorrow. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :