search for: motley

...f on practically any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped if needed. I think usage of any language features should be decided based on support from a either clang(n-j) release or a reference version (3.2 being my personal favorite) rather then on a common unbroken subset from a motley collection of other compilers. Just my 0.02$ after 2 months of building clang+llvm. Paweł > On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:38 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On 9 Jan 2013, at 04:49, Marc J. Driftmeyer wrote: >> >>> It's not a coincid...

...rt for MSVC in Clang is still not 100% functional, I believe. > > I think usage of any language features should be decided > based on support from a either clang(n-j) release or a > reference version (3.2 being my personal favorite) > rather then on a common unbroken subset from a motley > collection of other compilers. > While I would love to see this happen, I just don't think it's practical/feasible currently. > > Just my 0.02$ after 2 months of building clang+llvm. > > Paweł > > > > On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:38 AM, David Chisnall <David.Ch...

...I would rather avoid by using clang. > >> >> I think usage of any language features should be decided >> based on support from a either clang(n-j) release or a >> reference version (3.2 being my personal favorite) >> rather then on a common unbroken subset from a motley >> collection of other compilers. >> > > While I would love to see this happen, I just don't think it's > practical/feasible currently. > > At some point it is no longer a technical question as all the effort spent on ensuring compatibility with the other comp...

...approaches work with BSD). Am I correct that I can run BSD DomUs with the current release of Xen 3? Any thoughts/suggestions here? 5. Any suggestions regarding running databases on all of this (mostly to support my list manager, sympa)? 6. Any suggestions regarding management tools for this motley assemblage of stuff? 7. Am I going to take tremendous performance hits from all of this? 8. Am I crazy for considering all of this? (Maybe heresy on this list, but am I better off considering an all Linux/vserver, or all BSD/jails approach?) Thanks very much, in advance, for any suggestions....

Hi Guys, I''m playing with Blade 6300 to check performance of compressed ZFS with Oracle database. After some really simple tests I noticed that default (well, not really default, some patches applied, but definitely noone bother to tweak disk subsystem or something else) installation of S10U3 is actually faster than S10U4, and a lot faster. Actually it''s even faster on

.... > > > > >> > >> I think usage of any language features should be decided > >> based on support from a either clang(n-j) release or a > >> reference version (3.2 being my personal favorite) > >> rather then on a common unbroken subset from a motley > >> collection of other compilers. > >> > > > > While I would love to see this happen, I just don't think it's > > practical/feasible currently. > > > > > > At some point it is no longer a technical question as > all the effort spent...

This really isn't a CentOS specific queation but that is our server OS of choice. I manage a student file server and i would like to add cloud access to it. Basically i would like our students to have access to the same files at home that they have at school. This would allow them to start an asignment at home, finish it at school, and print it off without having to worry about losing their

James Haigh <james.r.haigh at gmail.com> > Note that 50% is silly, lossless compression is asymptotic. I 2nd Martin, > once you have high-density entropy, there's little more 'air' to > squeeze-out. 10-20% would be worth it if it helps adoption, although it's > worth studying how close we already are to the asymptote of entropy. How > much would be saved? How