search for: motiviation

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "motiviation".

Did you mean: motivation
2015 Dec 30
2
[PATCH 07/34] sparc: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
I find it a little bit irritating when I receive a patch directly addressed to me to review, but I don't see the "00/34" cover letter. I want to see what this series is about, and what the motiviation for this change is. I'm also highly frustrated, in general, with mix-and-match CC: lists for patch series. Just put everyone relevant in the CC: for the entire series. That way I can easily inspect other parts of the series to see infrastructure buildup, and examples of other conversions or...
2015 Dec 30
2
[PATCH 07/34] sparc: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
I find it a little bit irritating when I receive a patch directly addressed to me to review, but I don't see the "00/34" cover letter. I want to see what this series is about, and what the motiviation for this change is. I'm also highly frustrated, in general, with mix-and-match CC: lists for patch series. Just put everyone relevant in the CC: for the entire series. That way I can easily inspect other parts of the series to see infrastructure buildup, and examples of other conversions or...
2015 Dec 30
0
[PATCH 07/34] sparc: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:56:03PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > I find it a little bit irritating when I receive a patch directly > addressed to me to review, but I don't see the "00/34" cover letter. > > I want to see what this series is about, and what the motiviation > for this change is. > > I'm also highly frustrated, in general, with mix-and-match CC: lists > for patch series. Just put everyone relevant in the CC: for the > entire series. That way I can easily inspect other parts of the > series to see infrastructure buildup, and exa...
2003 May 16
0
DNA
There are some tools for handling genetic data in the 'genetics' package on CRAN. These were motiviated by the need to process population genetic data. -G > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Edmund Davison [mailto:davison at midway.uchicago.edu] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 1:58 PM > To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: [R] DNA > > > > Hi, is
2004 Dec 10
0
analog FXO debug suggestions
...de that input to the engineer who will then treat you quite well. If you can tell them to test the line upto your asterisk premise, they may accomodate you just this once, and that will help you incredibly. k) If you did get satisified, they would get revenue, OR THEY WILL LOSE YOU, that is their motiviation. Finally, analog telephone lines are simpler to fix than digital, only because they can be diagnosed within the range of human listening. You don't need expensive test sets.... but here is a trick, if you can find a software audio spectrum analyser (ref. WINSCOPE.EXE) which is simple, stupid a...
2004 Dec 07
0
Subject: Re: Analog FXO Woes Continue
...de that input to the engineer who will then treat you quite well. If you can tell them to test the line upto your asterisk premise, they may accomodate you just this once, and that will help you incredibly. k) If you did get satisified, they would get revenue, OR THEY WILL LOSE YOU, that is their motiviation. Finally, analog telephone lines are simpler to fix than digital, only because they can be diagnosed within the range of human listening. You don't need expensive test sets.... but here is a trick, if you can find a software audio spectrum analyser (ref. WINSCOPE.EXE) which is simple, stupid a...
2009 Apr 27
6
[PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support
Add optional MSI-X support: use a vector per virtqueue with fallback to a common vector and finally to regular interrupt. Teach all drivers to use it. I added 2 new virtio operations: request_vqs/free_vqs because MSI needs to know the total number of vectors upfront. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Here's a draft set of patches for MSI-X support in the
2009 Apr 27
6
[PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support
Add optional MSI-X support: use a vector per virtqueue with fallback to a common vector and finally to regular interrupt. Teach all drivers to use it. I added 2 new virtio operations: request_vqs/free_vqs because MSI needs to know the total number of vectors upfront. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Here's a draft set of patches for MSI-X support in the
2011 Feb 27
4
[PATCH] Add minimal mkstemp(3) implementation.
This uses time, ASLR and pid for randomisation. (Closes: #516774) Signed-off-by: Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.org> --- usr/include/stdlib.h | 2 + usr/klibc/Kbuild | 2 +- usr/klibc/mkstemp.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 usr/klibc/mkstemp.c diff --git a/usr/include/stdlib.h
2018 Apr 18
1
[RFC] Making GVN able to visit the same block more than once
Introduction ============ I'm currently in the middle of what initially looked to be a simple change in GVN but is turning out to have unexpected consequences that are turning out to be quite difficult to resolve, so I thought I'd send out an RFC to make sure that I'm not barking up the wrong tree with how I'm trying to do this. Motivation and current behaviour
2007 Sep 19
49
plugin dependencies
Hello all, The topic of plugin dependencies has come up before and it doesn''t seem to have been addressed by core or core doesn''t seem to think it''s an issue. I''ve looked at the current edge code and don''t see anything new, so if I''ve missed something *please* let me know. The following article makes mention of a require_plugin
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't