search for: motivant

Survey: "Motivation of Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) Developers" We (Marc R?ttig and Carl-Daniel Hailfinger) are currently working on a survey on the motivation of open source developers as part of a "Computer Science and Society" project at the CS department of the University of T?bingen. We invite every developer in the Free / Open Source Software community to help us

Dear developers I have just noticed your fantastic work, and I am looking forward to send you dumps of my GeForce 6150, when I get vacation in two weeks. It is an integrated GPU on my Asus A8N-VM CSM, so I hope it will work. The reason I post is, I am wondering what the motivation is for doing nVidia and not ATi? I have read the "FAQ:Why are you doing this?", but it doesn't

hi, im all new to linux. i am running ubuntu as my windows was causing me problems so i decided to go to linux. but i bought csi:dark motives before this happened and now i cant play it. i can install it using wine but when it nears to the end of the installation it says "run-time error '429'. ActiveX component cant't cretae object. please can someone tell me what im doing wrong

On Jan 19, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/19/2013 8:36 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> See: >> http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#picking-the-right-data-structure-for-a-task > > Were the "small n" characteristics the main motivation? It is one of the motivations. > Memory-wise, STL classes

On 1/21/2013 12:35 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I'm confused here. You're acting as though we don't use the STL. In fact, we do use std::string, std::vector, std::map etc when they are the right solution for the job. I'm trying to understand the reasoning behind the decisions made at the beginning of LLVM. My working assumption is that ADT didn't exist when LLVM

Dear Community, I hope that I have the right category selected because I am relatively new to the "R" world. I come with a relatively challenging problem in the luggage. I would like to realize, that "R" reads text files (there are several hundred pieces in my folder) sequentially, and screens for specific terms. If the term is found, the program should write a 1, if not a

Dear LLVMdev, We have a question regarding the semantics of the undefined value in LLVM IR. As far as we understand, in order to give a semantics to the undefined value, the semantics of LLVM IR is generalized to a rather unusual set-based semantics. More specifically, the notion of value in LLVM IR is generalized to a set of values, rather than a single value. Then the undefined value is simply

On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> It is one of the motivations. > > The reason I ask is that STL comes all ready, with containers and algorithms. They may not be optimal for every task, but they do their job and they are part of the standard. There may be some price to pay in terms of performance/memory usage/etc. for a

On 1/19/2013 10:00 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jan 19, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> Were the "small n" characteristics the main motivation? > > It is one of the motivations. What were the others? The reason I ask is that STL comes all ready, with containers and algorithms. They may not be optimal for

On 12 September 2016 at 16:23, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > What's the motivation to not build COFF and Mach-O parts? If you don't need > it, you could just leave it. Are you trying to reduce the executable size? It was just easier to remove coff::link() and mach_o::link() from lld.cpp than to add them to our own build infrastructure

On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? > > If

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > From: "Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > Some back story here. I have gotten many requests through email and > > at the developer meetings about having a Code of Conduct and > > specifically having one for LLVM Developer Meetings. It has been

A new one was just added recently - Clang's diagtool. So if you're looking at how to reduce install size, might want to double check that the motivation for adding that is consistent with/not contradictory with your goals/motivations for removing these. (also since several of these are clang binaries/tools - maybe check with the cfe-dev list too) On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:27 PM Vedant

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Mikhail Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Davide, > > Thanks for the analysis, it's really interesting! And I'm really glad that we now put more and more attention at the compile time! > > Just recently I've been looking into historical compile time data as well, and have had similar conclusions. The regressions

Chris Lattner wrote: > > No, not exactly. I need to find the path with the maximum execution time > > (in assembler for specific processor). Do to so, I must also find paths > > which cannot be executed no matter what input is (like one of the paths > > in the C example). I'm trying to do that using LLVM intermediate > > representation. > > In that case,

Ruby on Rails Engineer We''re looking for an experienced Ruby on Rails developer with top-notch software design and coding skills, ideally with knowledge of jQuery. Our stack includes Ruby, Rails, Javascript, ElasticSearch, and MySQL and we prefer generalists who have lots of successes at every layer of the stack. What you’ll be doing: • Architect, build, test and refine new products and

Hello, I was asking what was the motivation for not having the envelope From in the Maildir format, as defined in the qmail spec : "The message is delivered without an extra UUCP- style From_ line, without any >From quoting, and without an extra blank line at the end." which may sound silly since we lose an important piece of information. Same question about the motivation in

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > > int %logsch(int %ih, int %nbh) { > > > entry: > > > %tmp.1 = setlt int %nbh, 0 > > > %ih_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 10, int %ih > > > %nbh_addr.1 = select bool %tmp.1, int 0, int %nbh > > > %tmp.4 = setgt int %nbh_addr.1, 22528

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Mikhail Zolotukhin > <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Davide, > > > > Thanks for the analysis, it's really interesting! And I'm really glad > that we now put more and more attention at the compile time! >

Hey all, As some of you may know I created the Cucumber TextMate bundle: http://github.com/bmabey/cucumber-tmbundle/tree/master What most of you probably don''t know is that I stopped using TextMate (in favor of Vim) several months ago. Since then the Cucumber bundle has been somewhat neglected by me and I''ve mostly pulled in patches and regenerated the syntax for new