search for: motication

...Info handles platform-specific details, and we have target-specific subclasses of that class. The subclasses override functions defined in TargetInfo. The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That is a motication to do the following test. As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from TargetInfo. The original LLD links itself (with debug info) in 7.499 seconds. The de-virtualized version did the same thing in 7...

...we have target-specific subclasses of that class. The subclasses >> override functions defined in TargetInfo. >> >> The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each >> relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That >> is a motication to do the following test. >> >> As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move >> all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from >> TargetInfo. >> >> The original LLD links itself (with debug info) in 7.499 seconds...

...c details, > and we have target-specific subclasses of that class. The subclasses > override functions defined in TargetInfo. > > The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each > relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That > is a motication to do the following test. > > As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move all > code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from > TargetInfo. > > The original LLD links itself (with debug info) in 7.499 seconds. The > de-virtualize...

...es platform-specific details, and we have target-specific subclasses of that class. The subclasses override functions defined in TargetInfo. > > The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That is a motication to do the following test. > > As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from TargetInfo. > > The original LLD links itself (with debug info) in 7.499 seconds. The de-virtualized version did...

Hello,I have succeded in compiling and configuring My TDM Card and asterisk, all works fine. But I have a problem using the PHP Agi.The CLI tells me that when I call my number :-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' -- Executing [s at incoming:1] Answer("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack -- Executing [s at incoming:2] AGI("Zap/4-1", "rabot.agi") in

...fic subclasses of that class. The subclasses >>> override functions defined in TargetInfo. >>> >>> The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each >>> relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That >>> is a motication to do the following test. >>> >>> As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move >>> all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from >>> TargetInfo. >>> >>> The original LLD links itself (with debu...

...at class. The subclasses >>>> override functions defined in TargetInfo. >>>> >>>> The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each >>>> relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That >>>> is a motication to do the following test. >>>> >>>> As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move >>>> all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from >>>> TargetInfo. >>>> >>>> The original LLD...

...sses >>>>> override functions defined in TargetInfo. >>>>> >>>>> The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each >>>>> relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That >>>>> is a motication to do the following test. >>>>> >>>>> As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, move >>>>> all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` from >>>>> TargetInfo. >>>>> >>>&...

Hi everyone ! I have been working for a long time now on doing file sharing with a samba domain member of a Windows 2000 AD server. My Samba Server is visible in the Windows Network, and I've joined him using : kinit & net ads join... All that is fine, but when I try to access my shares from a W2k client, I receive the following message : Access denied because of conflicting

Hi, I'm attempting to install samba 3.0.4 with active directory support on Solaris 8. Is there any Howto document around?? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Ben Our name has changed. Please update your address book to the following format: "recipient@capgemini.com". This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the

Hi Lieven Thanks for advise ! the getent passwd command shows me all the users of the 2k domain in this format : DOMAIN2K+user:x:10000:10026::/home/NetBiosName/user:/bin/bash I think that's correct. But do you think I got to use nss pam or something like that ? I just can't login with a 2000 user on Samba, but guests (unknown users ) can, when I permit them to. So I think users are

...;>> override functions defined in TargetInfo. >>>>>> >>>>>> The TargetInfo member functions are called multiple times for each >>>>>> relocation. So the cost of virtual function calls may be non-neglible. That >>>>>> is a motication to do the following test. >>>>>> >>>>>> As a test, I removed all TargetInfo subclasses except for x86-64, >>>>>> move all code from X86_64TargetInfo to TargetInfo, and remove `virtual` >>>>>> from TargetInfo. >>>>&g...

Hello, I am running a Samba server (3.0.7) on a Suse 9.2 box. I have connected this server successfully to a Windows 2000 Active Directory (mixed mode). I have nsswitch.conf, krb5.conf configured and winbind seems to be running properly for the most part. With wbinfo I can get all of my user and group information. Problem is, it seems that at random times, the samba server just stops