Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "mostlikly".
Did you mean:
mostlikely
2019 Feb 25
2
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> Hai Marco,
>
> For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only,
> if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats mostlikely your error .
Likely. Here is the error (ignore the ip's - messed them
up for this response):
Feb 25 16:22:10 sce252 postfix/smtp[3114]: 0D1E86E3A6D:
to=<marco
2005 Nov 23
3
RHEL3 --> CentOS3 HP proliant 380
Hi,
I've got a HP 380 G2 which is running RHEL AS 3 Taroon update 1.
The current smp kernel 2.4.21-9smp is booting with a HPinitrd image.
Mostlikely generated with the HP proliant Service Pack for RHEL 3.
Now if I migrate this system to CentOS 3 and a new kernel will be
installed ,will that work ? Does the new centOS kernel use the same
config as the current RHEL kernel ?
Anyone done this
2003 Sep 14
5
can not browse the net from local network.
hi list,
i''m new to linux and shorewall. i''m facing a problem to browse the net from
local network.
IF my client machines are connected to firewall via switch, then can not
browse the internet but i can ping any site using fqdn like
(www.google.com).
IF i connect a single pc directly to the firewall using cross-over cable to
the internal interface, then i''m able to
2019 Feb 26
2
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
That parameter isn't defined in my main.cf file.
Is I add it and leave it blank. It still doesn't work.
On 2/25/2019 11:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.02.19 um 22:39 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba:
>> On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
>>> Hai Marco,
>>>
>>> For you own domains, dont point postfix to your
2019 Feb 24
4
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
Is there an extra step which must be taken to get postfix
to deliver email via a relay host when the postfix machine
is pointing to an samba internal DNS?
I did a test setup using a public DNS server and it worked.
Same setup where the machine (Debian 9) is pointing to a
samba DNS doesn't work. The errors in the postfix log
seem to be DNS related.
Thanks,
2020 Jul 22
1
Failed to modify SPNs
...eady tried my suggestions?
What do you see here:
> Failed to modify SPNs on CN=SEC-CON03,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com:
> acl: spn validation failed for ...
^^^^^^
So read the links below and post your results
The event id you showed, for now can be ignored. Inrelevant (for now).
And mostlikly wil disapear when you added/fixed the "correct" spn's
On topic for that event id you showed.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/935834/how-to-enable-ldap-signing-i
n-windows-server
The fix.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-...
2019 Feb 25
0
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
Hai Marco,
For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only,
if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats mostlikely your error .
Setup a caching DNS and setup a forward zone to internal.domain.tld and domain.tld. ( internet dns )
That makes sure that you dont break DKIM/DMARC/SPF/TLSA on the internet side.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk
2019 Feb 26
0
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
Am 25.02.19 um 22:39 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba:
> On 2/25/2019 3:36 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
>> Hai Marco,
>>
>> For you own domains, dont point postfix to your internal DNS only,
>> if done wrong you might miss dns info on the wan side and thats
>> mostlikely your error .
>
> Likely. Here is the error (ignore the ip's -
2019 Feb 26
0
Samba AD Internal DNS, Postfix & Email Relay
frankly post output of "postconf -n" - anyways, this is *not* a samba topic
Am 26.02.19 um 17:15 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba:
> That parameter isn't defined in my main.cf file.
> Is I add it and leave it blank. It still doesn't work.
> On 2/25/2019 11:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.02.19 um 22:39 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba:
2008 Apr 29
2
Kununtu Menu Problem With Wine
Very new to Linux so please be gentle. Running Kubuntu 8.04 (Gutsy).
Installed Wine and a couple of Windows apps. Couldn't get them to work so uninstalled apps (through Wine) then uninstalled Wine.
Found that the Wine entries were still visible in the K Menu so I deleted them (not sure how). I think I found them somewhere using the file manager (Dolphin) and deleted them there.
Now I have
2005 Feb 04
1
U32 port matching trouble
Hello,
I''m having some trouble with the u32 port match and that is when
specifying a mask.
tc filter add prio 1 dev ppp1 parent 2:0 protocol ip u32 match ip dst
0.0.0.0/0 match ip protocol 17 0xff match ip dport 27015 0xffff flowid 2:4
Using 27015 0xffff works just fine, all packets to dport 27015 go to 2:4
tc filter add prio 1 dev ppp2 parent 2:0 protocol ip u32 match ip dst
2004 Jul 15
3
Important note for AGI with PHP newbies
I say this note is important only because I (a AGI PHP newbie) was
tormented by this problem for many an hour, even though I'm sure it's
documented somewhere or obvious to more experienced users.
So as I was experimenting with AGI in PHP scripting I was baffled by why
Asterisk was properly receiving AGI commands written to stdout but
always returning "510 invalid command" to the
2020 Jul 22
4
Failed to modify SPNs
Hi all
my samba version is 4.12.5 and when a sql server windows machine join
the domain, It shows error in samba :
Failed to modify SPNs on CN=SEC-CON03,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com:
acl: spn validation failed for
spn[E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2-ADAM/SEC-CON03:389] uac[0x1000]
account[SEC-CON03$] hostname[SEC-Con03.domain.com] nbname[DOMAIN]
ntds[(null)] forest[domain.com]
2009 Nov 17
14
X45xx storage vs 7xxx Unified storage
We are looking at adding to our storage. We would like ~20TB-30 TB.
we have ~ 200 nodes (1100 cores) to feed data to using nfs, and we are looking for high reliability, good performance (up to at least 350 MBytes /second over 10 GigE connection) and large capacity.
For the X45xx (aka thumper) capacity and performanance seem to be there (we have 3 now)
However, for system upgrades , maintenance