search for: mostawesomedude

7.8 branch (533b7663) : 209/246 master branch (c882c31) : 216/241 In short : 8 fail/warn -> pass 5 fail -> skip 1 pass -> fail So the only regression is glean/clipFlat Output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Test clipping with flat shading (provoking vertex). clipFlat: Failure for glBegin/End(GL_QUADS), glFrontFace(GL_CCW) GL_EXT_provoking_vertex

...installing makedepend ;-) 20:37 < jbarnes> heh 20:39 < Dr_Jakob> I don't often have to do a make clean. 20:40 < suokko> I guess there is something broken in radeon makefiles because make clean is required quite often 20:40 < suokko> Luckily ccache is very fast 20:40 < MostAwesomeDude> Yeah, ccache is a much better friend than makedepend. 21:48 < shining> still not very clear to me, should everyone have makedepend installed for building mesa ? 21:49 < Dr_Jakob> it is higly recommended yes. 21:51 < shining> does it help with mesa build failures ? I have see...

So, basically, you allocate the rasterizer units according to the vertex shader, and when the fragment shader comes up, you say "write rasterizer output 4 to fragment input 1000000"? The current nouveau drivers can't do this. There are "routing" registers in hardware, but I think the nVidia proprietary driver (at least without GLSL) leaves them unaltered after

Hi radeonhd, nouveau, mesa3d developers, Firstly, thank you all very much for all the important work you do. I've been working as a part-time developer on the "Spring RTS" project (open-source game engine) which runs on linux (and other os). Some time ago I tried the engine on the open-source ATI radeonhd driver, which I understand to be partly based on mesa 3d, and all textures

Zack Rusin wrote: >> Sure, it would be very reasonable to make these target-specific >> builtins when targeting a GPU, the same way we have target-specific >> builtins for SSE. > > Actually currently the plan is to have essentially a "two pass" LLVM IR. I > wanted the first one to never lower any of the GPU instructions so we'd have > intrinsics or

Alex wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry I am not sure this question should go to llvm or mesa3d-dev mailing > list, so I post it to both. > > I am writing a llvm backend for a modern graphics processor which has a ISA > very similar to that of Direct 3D. > > I am reading the code in Gallium-3D driver in a mesa3d branch, which > converts the shader programs (TGSI tokens) to