search for: moreso

...ilities). 3. The CVS server is hosted at Illinois. You will have to get buy in from them and a volenteer with access to the machine to do the upgrade work (including converting the post-commit hooks, etc). 4. I maintain that a real distributed VCS would be very useful for LLVM, perhaps moreso than the other features provided by new VCS's. Last time this came up, the available distributed vcs's all had serious issues. Perhaps mercurial is 'there now'. I don't know. Personally, I don't really care which VCS we use. I use SVN with the llvm-gcc stuff an...

...ncryption passwords in user database, or call doveadm > mailbox cryptokey password during password change. I have custom userdb lookup so I don't mind to manage key encryption passwords in database, but how do I do it? Is it by to include mail_crypt_private_password in the userdb lookup? Moreso,, if I want password same to be as regular IMAP password, is there security problem? I think it's possible to return plaintext password for userdb lookup with %w right? Moreso,, I don't see that to work because maybe pwd changes in userdb but encryption keys (stored where?) still be encryp...

Well i'm using Ubuntu [Lucid] and running WoW via Wine [latest version] but there are some issues with the graphics, and moreso the lagg. Graphic issues: Black under players and npcs and Bugged textures for player armor and skin [Image: http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3918/screenshot1wj.png ] http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3918/screenshot1wj.png Lagg Game laggs rly bad, like as if i was in icc 25, but in reality im...

I wonder if anyone has tried using an IMAP server with Amazon S3 as a backend. There would be many factors to consider (speed, etc). However, moreso, I don't know that Maildir(++) would support multiple folders that might be linked into the cloud. For example, higher-I/O local incoming mail is on disk, some folders archived on S3. Could be easily done by simply creating another account and storing its Maildir in S3 -- Curious....

...p a CVS commit then cvsps may be useful, or, as others have said, use Tailor to convert to a local repos. in your preferred format. http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/ http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor > 4. I maintain that a real distributed VCS would be very useful for > LLVM, perhaps moreso than the other features provided by new VCS's. > Last time this came up, the available distributed vcs's all had > serious issues. Perhaps mercurial is 'there now'. I don't know. Bazaar, from Canonical -- the same people as behind Ubuntu, has been concentrating on perfo...

...base, or call >> doveadm mailbox cryptokey password during password change. > > I have custom userdb lookup so I don't mind to manage key encryption > passwords in database, but how do I do it? Is it by to include > mail_crypt_private_password in the userdb lookup? > > Moreso,, if I want password same to be as regular IMAP password, is > there security problem? I think it's possible to return plaintext > password for userdb lookup with %w right? > > Moreso,, I don't see that to work because maybe pwd changes in userdb > but encryption keys (stored...

...er smart pointer ownership is > > a direction we want to take the LLVM project in general. > > > > I've seen others contribute and have myself contributed many patches > > moving towards smart pointer ownership (both in the pre-C++11 days of > > OwningPtr, and much moreso in the post-C++11 world with > > std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr being usable inside containers, as > > return values, etc, allowing many more opportunities). > > > > std::unique_ptr's been used in LLD as far back as r153620. > > std::unique_ptr appeared in LLV...

...function. Is this an inherent > overhead or am I calling it incorrectly or is this something that > can be optimized in the OCaml bindings? The high-level calling convention using GenericValue is going to be very slow relative to a native function call. This is true in C++, but even moreso in Ocaml, which must cons up a bunch of objects on the heap for each call. To get best performance, you would want to avoid fine-grained calls into JIT'd code, e.g. by iterating over inputs inside the JIT instead of outside. If you want to improve performance of the GenericValue-based...

...urces for manging the filesystem. One place I could see a use for the OCFS2 is a shared ORACLE_HOME among nodes, but that has its own pros & cons which can be debated on some other mailing list :) So I'm curious, what benefits are there to having the OCFS2 available on the RAC system, moreso related to using it for CRS and DB storage purposes?

...13307. The basic question here seems to be whether smart pointer ownership is a direction we want to take the LLVM project in general. I've seen others contribute and have myself contributed many patches moving towards smart pointer ownership (both in the pre-C++11 days of OwningPtr, and much moreso in the post-C++11 world with std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr being usable inside containers, as return values, etc, allowing many more opportunities). std::unique_ptr's been used in LLD as far back as r153620. std::unique_ptr appeared in LLVM shortly after the C++11 switch with Ahmed's...

...compiled it on other distros in this config without issues. 2. This is ubuntu Studio which uses an RT (realtime kernel).. There seems to be very little aout there regarding running asterisk on RT linux... one woudl think this would have some benefits.. Big benefits.. I've always wondered. But moreso in a nn-virtual machine environment. Asterisk builds just fine and works. Kernel is : 2.6.31-9-rt (buildd at palmer) (gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) ) #152-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT Thu Oct 15 05:01:14 UTC 2009 Install is Ubuntu Studio 9.10 (Karmic) 32bit and up to date. I have not yet...

Two easy questions after having read the LARTC HOWTO document (which by the way is a *fantastic* document. Congratulations to all who contributed!) First is: Can I prioritise my "drops" on incoming traffic when the link is overloaded. ie instead of just tail dropping, can I "prefer" to drop certain classes of traffic? If so, do I do this by setting up, say, a HTB tree

...nd we can't guarantee this during static initialization. 3) If global_lock is a ManagedStatic<Mutex>, then it will get into an infinite recursion here when trying to allocate this ManagedStatic. I actually started to feel this way since the first time I started looking at LLVM, but even moreso increasingly I feel that the solution is that ManagedStatics should not be allowed to be accessed until after main begins. llvm_shutdown() gives deterministic order of destroying managed statics, but we don't have deterministic order of *creation* of those ManagedStatics. I have a patch up[2...

Good Evening! I''m having issues with the order in which items are ran inside of a service class, it''s attempting to run before the provider is present (the provider is provided by the glassfish package). It looks for the glassfish provider prior to inheriting the repository or the package list. http://snipt.org/woomg I have included a snipt of the code, does anyone have an

I'm having another play with LLVM using the OCaml bindings for a forthcoming OCaml Journal article and I have a couple of remarks: Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml bindings? Secondly, I happened to

...ric is grouping used sets by parent basic-block rather than function (#3). Experimentally, #1 catches a lot of the singleton-ish globals out there, which is the majority in some of the more "modern" code I've looked at. It leaves the legitimate merging in perl alone. #2 (and even moreso #3) is actually too aggressive, and doesn't catch a lot/most of the profitable cases in perl. Consider: - a "g_log" global (or, say, LLVM's outs/dbgs/errs), used pretty much everywhere - several sets of globals, used in different parts of the program (perl's interpreter vs pa...

Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2016, 09:03:45 CEST schrieb Alex Xu: Hi Alex, > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:24:27 +0200 > > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Stephan Mueller > > > > <smueller at chronox.de> wrote: > > > And finally, you have a coding error that is very very common but > > > fatal

Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2016, 09:03:45 CEST schrieb Alex Xu: Hi Alex, > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:24:27 +0200 > > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Stephan Mueller > > > > <smueller at chronox.de> wrote: > > > And finally, you have a coding error that is very very common but > > > fatal

Hai, Do you have advice about Dovecot plugins for mail encryption: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailCrypt https://0xacab.org/riseuplabs/trees I like NaCL based encryption but the MailCrypt plugin is better because it's maintained by Dovecot developers (is this correct?) Hard to understand MailCrypt docs so may I ask, may I provide per user encryption? I don't like global

The canonical example of using BackgrounDRb involves updating a progress bar on some user''s web page. Therefore, the long running background process has some affiliation with a view. How can backgroundrb be used for long running processes that are NOT associated with a controller/view? Is this even possible? I understand the nature of Rails is such that it does "just in