search for: moots

I have compiled both my kernel (2.4.17) and samba (2.2.3a) to support ACL/EAs. It looks like it has gone well, but I get one message that worries me, but I don't know if it should or not. checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no As you can see, the last line is where my

I still can't get xapian core to build on windows so I guess it is kind of moot to begin with. Just wondering.

I have a R script that I call from python using rpy2. It uses dplyr, doBy, and ggplot2. The script has install.packages commands for these 3 packages. Even thought the packages are already installed it still downloads, builds, and installs them, which is very time consuming. Is there a way to have it only do the install if the package is not already installed? Also, I run in a docker container,

I've looked through the code for sys_mmap2 on several architectures, and it looks like some architectures plays by the "shift is always 12" rule, e.g. SPARC, and some expect userspace to actually obtain the page size, e.g. PowerPC and MIPS. On some architectures, e.g. x86 and ARM, the point is moot since PAGE_SIZE is always 2^12. a. Is this correct, or have I misunderstood

On 1/22/2016 11:00 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > It works on linux, it can't be secure? if you can insert a custom Machine Owner Key into this keyring, then anyone with sufficient ingenuity can, too. which renders the whole signature thing moot, other than as another step to be cracked. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

since i cant manage to get the accelerated ferret going (amd64 incompatible C code) and hyperestraier returns 0 results for everything after a reboot (despite claiming its index is every bit as big as before) i made a simple rails inverted index that essentially just does a find_or_create_by_word for each word, and then adds its id to a join table linking words and documents.. the only

On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 15:03 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The exception I mentioned is that I would really like the virtio device > to expose via whatever transport we chose to use (though capability > exchange sounds like a reasonable one) whether the "server" > implementation is bypassing IOMMUs or not instead on relying on client > side heuristics. > >

On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 15:03 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The exception I mentioned is that I would really like the virtio device > to expose via whatever transport we chose to use (though capability > exchange sounds like a reasonable one) whether the "server" > implementation is bypassing IOMMUs or not instead on relying on client > side heuristics. > >

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

It may be moot because Reed is currently rewriting the patch to avoid using EmitInlineAsm and EmitRawText but I wanted to question something here. I'm thinking that hasRawTextSupport() shouldn't be the condition used inside EmitInlineAsm. I think it would be more correct to have a useRawTextSupport() predicate that can return hasRawTextSupport() for (sub)targets that haven't

Hey All ! I ended up browsing to Eric Hodel''s blog the other night, and found his entry about the new cache_model and memcache-client. Now, it looks like it''s "officially" out in the open: http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/articles/2006/01/20/caching-models-with-memcached In my application, I''ve been staying away from caching my models, and instead just doing

Hello, Here are some humble suggestions for 'doc/menu.txt' and 'doc/syslinux.txt'. They might be relevant for other documentation sources too. Unfortunately, I don't know how to prepare adequate patches. For 'menu.txt': _ Line 8: "located in the menu/ subdirectly." Suggestion: "located in the 'com32/cmenu' subdirectory." _ Line 10:

So, I remember we discussed this earlier this year, but I can't find the thread. The idea is to move libunwind into compiler-rt for the simple reasons below: 1. Unwinding is not exclusive to C++, nor exception handling. 2. Clang still includes libgcc_s and libgcc_eh when using compiler-rt (maybe eh isn't needed, but it was there for libgcc). 3. Testing the libunwind with libc++ on ARM is

I'm trying to upgrade an 11 month old FreeBSD 7 image in a VMware 4.5.2 guest to an up-to-date -stable and it panics as above. I've added a printf to report the two counts and there's a difference of one page. I don't have any problems with the old 7-stable image or up-to-date 6-stable or -current using the same VMware version. A screendump for a verbose boot can be found at

Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release > itself. And while you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part

On 05/05/2015 07:21 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 05/03/2015 10:55 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> I did a small measurement of the pure locking functions on bare metal >> without and with my patches. >> >> spin_lock() for the first time (lock and code not in cache) dropped from >> about 600 to 500 cycles. >> >> spin_unlock() for first time dropped

On 05/05/2015 07:21 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 05/03/2015 10:55 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> I did a small measurement of the pure locking functions on bare metal >> without and with my patches. >> >> spin_lock() for the first time (lock and code not in cache) dropped from >> about 600 to 500 cycles. >> >> spin_unlock() for first time dropped

Greetings Charles; I hope you had a nice Christmas, and will have a happy and prosperous new year in 2016. You mentioned upsrw in a message earlier, so I ran it, and found the shutdown timeout was only 20 seconds. gene at coyote:~$ upsrw myups [input.transfer.high] High voltage transfer point (V) Type: STRING Value: 140 [input.transfer.low] Low voltage transfer point (V) Type: STRING Value:

Hi! I'm trying to setup samba 2.2.4 on MandrakeLinux 8.2. The server should act as a file storage for about 25 Windows 2000 clients. Setting up a "basic" server which just serves the files is easy. However, I'd also like to support NT ACLs on the Samba server. Well, what do I have to do, to get it to work? I'm using the Mandrake RPM for 2.2.4, which has ACL support