search for: moot

...not. checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no As you can see, the last line is where my concern lies. Can anyone shed some light on what is being done here? Thanks alot, Al Moote

I still can't get xapian core to build on windows so I guess it is kind of moot to begin with. Just wondering.

...nstalled? Also, I run in a docker container, so after the container is instantiated the packages are not there the first time the script runs. Is there a way to pre load the packages, in which case I would not need the install.packages commands for these packages and my above question would become moot. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...through the code for sys_mmap2 on several architectures, and it looks like some architectures plays by the "shift is always 12" rule, e.g. SPARC, and some expect userspace to actually obtain the page size, e.g. PowerPC and MIPS. On some architectures, e.g. x86 and ARM, the point is moot since PAGE_SIZE is always 2^12. a. Is this correct, or have I misunderstood the code? b. If so, is this right, or is this a bug? Right now both klibc and ?Clibc consider the latter a bug. c. Which architectures are affected which way? -hpa

On 1/22/2016 11:00 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > It works on linux, it can't be secure? if you can insert a custom Machine Owner Key into this keyring, then anyone with sufficient ingenuity can, too. which renders the whole signature thing moot, other than as another step to be cracked. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

...kes about 2 or 3 seconds to index a reasonably large article, so this slows down ''add'' operations, etc.. ezra''s backrounDRb sounds like it will hit the spot. but how does acts_as_searchable and acts_as_ferret handle this. are they so much faster than indexing time is moot? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...IG_PPC, what > is essentially an attribute of the server-side, ie, whether is bypasses > the iommu for the PCI bus it resides on. > I believe all the arguments about whether this should be a bus property > or whether the x86 case can be worked around via ACPI tables etc... are > all moot. Today, qemu implementation can put virtio devices on busses > with an iommu and bypass it, so at the very least for backward > compatibility, we should expose that appropriately from the "server" > side. And of course, since we are talking about backward compatibility with exis...

...IG_PPC, what > is essentially an attribute of the server-side, ie, whether is bypasses > the iommu for the PCI bus it resides on. > I believe all the arguments about whether this should be a bus property > or whether the x86 case can be worked around via ACPI tables etc... are > all moot. Today, qemu implementation can put virtio devices on busses > with an iommu and bypass it, so at the very least for backward > compatibility, we should expose that appropriately from the "server" > side. And of course, since we are talking about backward compatibility with exis...

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 05:34:01PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > It is the address of &steal_time that will exceed the 32-bit limit. That seems extremely unlikely. That would mean we have more than 4G worth of per-cpu variables declared in the kernel.

It may be moot because Reed is currently rewriting the patch to avoid using EmitInlineAsm and EmitRawText but I wanted to question something here. I'm thinking that hasRawTextSupport() shouldn't be the condition used inside EmitInlineAsm. I think it would be more correct to have a useRawTextSupport() pre...

...lication, I''ve been staying away from caching my models, and instead just doing lookups based on different ID''s that I pass around. I heard that this was a good practice, as your sessioned models could become inconsisent (ie: if it was updated). Now, it looks like this may be a moot point, as the cache_model implements ActiveRecord::Locking, and the memcache-client solves some performance issues. Is this the case ? It would indeed be *much* easier to store some models in the session, than to do lookups all over the place, so was just wondering what other people think. Let me...

Hello, Here are some humble suggestions for 'doc/menu.txt' and 'doc/syslinux.txt'. They might be relevant for other documentation sources too. Unfortunately, I don't know how to prepare adequate patches. For 'menu.txt': _ Line 8: "located in the menu/ subdirectly." Suggestion: "located in the 'com32/cmenu' subdirectory." _ Line 10:

...all libc++ unwind-depending tests would have to either be moved or rely on implicit dependencies. An alternative to fix the libc++ tests on ARM would be to require Compiler-RT to be there as well, but, as I said, Clang links gcc_eh and gcc_s when you choose --rtlib=compiler-rt, making the exercise moot. Or we could just say that libc++ *needs* compiler-RT and call it a day. Ideas? cheers, --renato

I'm trying to upgrade an 11 month old FreeBSD 7 image in a VMware 4.5.2 guest to an up-to-date -stable and it panics as above. I've added a printf to report the two counts and there's a difference of one page. I don't have any problems with the old 7-stable image or up-to-date 6-stable or -current using the same VMware version. A screendump for a verbose boot can be found at

...hile you're suggesting where I could find out more or > take part in the discussion, Leon, keep in mind that I've been using > CentOS since it was first released, I am on the -dev mailing list, and > I was a part of the discussion of this new numbering scheme when it > was first mooted - my recommendation was that if you did it at all, > you should use names like 7.2.1511. And I recall that the decision > was to use release names like 7.2.1511. > > If we can get the version numbering scheme right here: > > [lindahl at rd ~]$ more /etc/centos-release > Cen...

...olate icache hot/cold from dcache hot/cold? It seems to me the > main difference will be whether the branch predictor is warmed up rather > than if the lock itself is in dcache, but its much more likely that the > lock code is icache if the code is lock intensive, making the cold case > moot. But that's pure speculation. > > Could you see any differences in workloads beyond microbenchmarks? > > Not that its my call at all, but I think we'd need to see some concrete > improvements in real workloads before adding the complexity of more pvops. I did another test on...

...olate icache hot/cold from dcache hot/cold? It seems to me the > main difference will be whether the branch predictor is warmed up rather > than if the lock itself is in dcache, but its much more likely that the > lock code is icache if the code is lock intensive, making the cold case > moot. But that's pure speculation. > > Could you see any differences in workloads beyond microbenchmarks? > > Not that its my call at all, but I think we'd need to see some concrete > improvements in real workloads before adding the complexity of more pvops. I did another test on...

...shutdown on this system as it seems to need 40 or more seconds to begin a reboot by entering the BIOS post routine. So I tried to reset that to 120 seconds, which the battery can do nicely, and I have a 20kw in the back yard that is up and running, lights back on in 16 or 17 seconds, so is 98% moot, but found I cannot, even as root, adjust this. gene at coyote:~$ upsrw -s ups.delay.shutdown=120 myups Username (gene): gene Password: my user pw here Unexpected response from upsd: ERR ACCESS-DENIED Nut was never given a pw on this system. I, and ups however are members of group nut, and that...

Hi! I'm trying to setup samba 2.2.4 on MandrakeLinux 8.2. The server should act as a file storage for about 25 Windows 2000 clients. Setting up a "basic" server which just serves the files is easy. However, I'd also like to support NT ACLs on the Samba server. Well, what do I have to do, to get it to work? I'm using the Mandrake RPM for 2.2.4, which has ACL support