Displaying 20 results from an estimated 33 matches for "moolenaar".
2008 May 20
1
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!")
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 20, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> The following IR is causing the assert:
The issue here is that the IA64 backend doesn't have inline asm support
yet. This should be pretty easy to add. Take a look at the X86 version:
X86TargetLowering::getRegForInlin...
2008 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!")
...ssuming the correct fix is to enhance
llvm::TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint(), can someone give
me
some pointers as to how to fix it? I have no experience with the code
and
like to get my hands dirty...
Thanks,
BTW: Is there a cross-reference of the project somewhere?
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com
2008 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!")
[correction]
On May 20, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> All,
>
> The following IR is causing the assert:
>
> \begin{ll}
> ; ModuleID = 'x.bc'
> target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-
> i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-
> f80:128:128"
> tar...
2008 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>> your
>> problem?
>>
>>
> Alas, it didn't fix the problem:
>
Crumbs.
I think that the analysis I told you before wasn...
2008 May 25
3
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures.
>>> Many
>>> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
>>> allocations are?
>>...
2008 May 26
2
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support]
On May 26, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>>> your
>>> problem?
>>>
>>>
>> Alas, it didn't fix the problem:
>>
> Crumbs.
>
>...
2004 Jun 01
0
SANE 2004 Free Software Bazaar
...ine
is June 7, that is next week!
More information on the SANE website: www.sane.nl
- Bram
(*) If we succeed in finding a sponsor....
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
18. Your wife drapes a blond wig over your monitor to remind you of what she
looks like.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram at Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// Sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ Project leader for A-A-P -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ Buy at Amazon and help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF.nl/click1.html ///
2009 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support.
> I can see how that could be a problem for people.
>
> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the
> target get axed without considering my email/request...
Hi Marcel,
There are two levels...
2008 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support]
Thanks for tracking this down! I can't seem to reproduce it on Linux,
even with valgrind.
Can you try out this patch and let me know whether it works?
Nick
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 26, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> On May 25, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>> On May 25, 2008, at 12:58 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you try this (massively hacky) patch out to see if it fixes
>>&...
2003 May 21
6
5.0-RELEASE --> cannot build any Mozilla Version
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 and cannot build any Mozilla version from ports.
The build exits for all versions at the same point. A source file called jsdtoa.c.
Thanks..
Here is my error report:
*******************************************************************************
cc -o jsdtoa.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD5\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DEXPORT_JS_API
2009 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support.
>> I can see how that could be a problem for people.
>>
>> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the
>> target get axed without considering my email/request...
>
&...
2008 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] fix for FreeBSD/powerpc build breakage
...rpc__ 1
A related define that could also be used to select the right
inline assembly statement is:
#define __GNUCLIKE_ASM 3
In any case, register naming in inline assembly on FreeBSD is
the same as the Linux version, so maybe the condition can be
simplified and based on the OS?
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com
2008 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
On May 24, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Let us know if you would like extra eyes on the two PPC failures.
>> Many
>> of us have a lot of experience with C++. :-) Do you know where these
>> allocations are?
>
> I don't mind if peopl...
2009 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for
>> your
>> work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple
>> programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need
>> to
>> produce amazingly fast code,...
2009 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
...it
in the tree for a bit longer, but disconnect it?
BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support.
I can see how that could be a problem for people.
Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the
target get axed without considering my email/request...
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com
2009 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
Hello,
LLVM's IA-64 target has not been maintained for a few years, and it is
currently unable to compile many simple testcases. I'm planning to
remove it from the tree soon, unless someone objects.
Dan
2009 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
...ptable
or do you prefer something less public (protecting the LLVM
"brand" comes to mind)?
I'll watch the commit logs and when I see ia64 being axed, I'll pick
the latest release (2.5 right now, but maybe 2.6) and use that as
the basis for the work.
Cheers,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com
2008 May 05
2
PCI serial card works on 6.2 but not on 6.3
We have upgraded a box from 6.2 to 6.3-RELEASE. Afterwards the box does not
recognize its ST Lab I-160 serial card with Netmos 9845 Chipset. It worked
flawlessly on 6.2 with puc(4) driver.
>From dmesg:
pci1: <simple comms, UART> at device 8.0 (no driver attached)
~# pciconf -l -v | grep -B 4 UART
none2@pci1:8:0: class=0x070002 card=0x00041000 chip=0x98459710 rev=0x01
hdr=0x00
2008 May 24
5
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support
...cateSimplifier/2006-11-04-ReplacingZeros.ll | opt -
predsimplify -disable-output
Assertion failed: (validPredicate(R) && "Invalid predicate."),
function update, file /dumpster/home/marcel/LLVM/src/llvm/lib/
Transforms/Scalar/PredicateSimplifier.cpp, line 701.
FYI,
--
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt at mac.com
2009 Jul 17
1
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:53 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> At this point, I think we should remove the Itanium backend from
>> mainline. I would be thrilled if you would take it and fix it up and
>> get it working out of tree. If you get it working on significant
>> programs (regardless of the performance of tho...