Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "moodymudskipp".
Did you mean:
moodymudskipper
2024 Mar 29
1
declare and validate options
...t; can
> > almost always be replaced by objects under a `globals` environment in the
> > namespace, it's just a bit more work
> >
> > I tried to do as much as possible with static analysis using my package
> opt
> > but it can only go so far : https://github.com/moodymudskipper/opt
> >
> > I think we can do a bit better and that it's not necessarily so complex,
> > here's a draft of possible design :
> >
> > We could have something like this in a package to register options along
> > with an optional validator, triggered on `o...
2024 Mar 29
1
declare and validate options
...r global nature and contribute to the mess, I think they can
almost always be replaced by objects under a `globals` environment in the
namespace, it's just a bit more work
I tried to do as much as possible with static analysis using my package opt
but it can only go so far : https://github.com/moodymudskipper/opt
I think we can do a bit better and that it's not necessarily so complex,
here's a draft of possible design :
We could have something like this in a package to register options along
with an optional validator, triggered on `options(..)` (or a new function).
# similar to registerS3m...
2024 Mar 29
1
declare and validate options
...ibute to the mess, I think they can
> almost always be replaced by objects under a `globals` environment in the
> namespace, it's just a bit more work
>
> I tried to do as much as possible with static analysis using my package opt
> but it can only go so far : https://github.com/moodymudskipper/opt
>
> I think we can do a bit better and that it's not necessarily so complex,
> here's a draft of possible design :
>
> We could have something like this in a package to register options along
> with an optional validator, triggered on `options(..)` (or a new functi...
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
On 05/10/2019 7:50 p.m., Gabriel Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think there's some nuance here that makes makes me agree partially with
> each "side".
>
> The pipe is inarguably extremely popular. Many probably think of it as a
> core feature of R, along with the tidyverse that (as was pointed out)
> largely surrounds it and drives its popularity. Whether its